Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-05-2022, 08:10 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,558 posts, read 17,232,713 times
Reputation: 17599

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
This morning using "tactical" nuclear weapons in the Ukraine has become a topic of grave concern.

How do you think the allies will respond if Russia uses any nuclear weapons in Ukraine.
brandon will have to draft all the wokies to be led by incompetent generals. Canadian border will be overrun by wokies seeking asylum.

Only wokies are fit to serve in Biden's military.

Elect dems and sacrifice your children as cannon fodder for the socialists who control biden.

The world will soon be covering Putin's funeral.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-05-2022, 09:47 AM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,223,977 times
Reputation: 29354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Universe93B View Post
Trump praised Russia for taking Crimea. He called the build-up of Russian troops on the Ukrainian border a "genius move." He said Ukraine would fall "fairly quickly." He's always liked Putin. Now he'll take his words back since Russia is losing so badly because we all know Trump will abandon ship so quickly just to say he was right.
When did he praise Crimea? That was 2014.

Calling the buildup a "genius" move isn't the same thing as condoning. It's simply saying it was an effective move for Russia. If you're rooting for your home team, recognizing a great play by the other team doesn't mean you are rooting for the other team. You speak of words, let's look at actions.

Trump's actions were not pro-Russian. He fired 67 cruise missiles into Russia-backed Syrian airbases. He repeatedly warned the EU to not become dependent on Russian energy. He raised the pressure on NATO countries to increase their funding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2022, 10:40 AM
 
13,601 posts, read 4,934,489 times
Reputation: 9687
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagogeorge View Post
NATO bombed Serbia in 1999. Serbia didn't attack any NATO member state. NATO's charter says nothing about taking actions against a country under attack that is not a member
Yes, that was done (as you know) to prevent a genocide by Serbians against Kosovo. NATO should have acted sooner, before Serbian Slobodan Milosevic committed war crimes against Bosnia.

Why is it that Russia and her allies (Serbia, Syria) are always trying to commit genocide?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2022, 05:30 PM
 
29,534 posts, read 19,626,354 times
Reputation: 4549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo58 View Post
Yes, that was done (as you know) to prevent a genocide by Serbians against Kosovo. NATO should have acted sooner, before Serbian Slobodan Milosevic committed war crimes against Bosnia.

Genocide? There was none. That has been long established some 20 years ago Kosovo assault 'was not genocide


Maybe ethnic cleansing since Serbian forces were fighting KLA separatists who hid among the civilian population. So tens of thousands fled/were forced out by Serbian forces.


The KLAs goal was to form a Greater Albania.

Quote:
The KLA made its first public statement in late 1997 during a funeral service for an Albanian teacher killed by Serbian police. The speech was a call to arms outlining the KLA’s position and objectives, which included the secession of Kosovo from Serbia and the eventual creation of a “Greater Albania,”
Still nothing in NATO's Charter says they have to get involved in conflicts within borders of other non NATO countries. It's a defense pact between member nations. If individual countries want to supply the Ukrainian with arms more power to them. This is turning into a NATO vs Russia war rather than a Russia vs Ukraine war. Not good at all.


Quote:
Why is it that Russia and her allies (Serbia, Syria) are always trying to commit genocide?

You don't think NATO countries have massacred people too? What has NATO member Turkey done to its Kurdish population in Turkey and Syria? Nevermind it's recent history in Cyprus the Aegean violations against its NATO ally Greece and Armenians long ago. And Nevermind what the human toll of the US invasion of Iraq was...

Last edited by chicagogeorge; 10-05-2022 at 06:06 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2022, 06:43 PM
 
8,151 posts, read 3,678,584 times
Reputation: 2719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo58 View Post
Yes, that was done (as you know) to prevent a genocide by Serbians against Kosovo. NATO should have acted sooner, before Serbian Slobodan Milosevic committed war crimes against Bosnia.

Why is it that Russia and her allies (Serbia, Syria) are always trying to commit genocide?
1. No UN authorization.

2. You do know that the "freedom fighters" have been indicted in the Hague?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2022, 05:00 AM
Status: "“If a thing loves, it is infinite.”" (set 3 days ago)
 
Location: Great Britain
27,180 posts, read 13,469,799 times
Reputation: 19501
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
This morning using "tactical" nuclear weapons in the Ukraine has become a topic of grave concern.

How do you think the allies will respond if Russia uses any nuclear weapons in Ukraine.
NATO would go in to Ukraine with other global allies as part of a UN Directorate, and would secure the country, and provide aid and assistance.

Russia would be told to move it's remaining forces out of Ukrainian territory or face being targeted by NATO aircraft and ground forces.

NATO's nuclear missiles would be on high alert, and it would be made clear to Russia that it would be destroyed if it used nuclear missiles against any NATO country.

Russia seems to forget that it's not the only country with nuclear missiles, despite it's abhorrent threats.

The targeting of Putin and his family in the event of a war would be a priority.

Last edited by Brave New World; 10-08-2022 at 05:10 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2022, 05:54 AM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,848 posts, read 8,210,859 times
Reputation: 4590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brave New World View Post
Russia seems to forget that it's not the only country with nuclear missiles.
No it doesn't, rofl. The real question is whether Russia would use nukes if there was an eminent existential threat? There are many who don't even believe Russia would use nukes if it was faced with full-scale invasion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2022, 05:59 AM
Status: "“If a thing loves, it is infinite.”" (set 3 days ago)
 
Location: Great Britain
27,180 posts, read 13,469,799 times
Reputation: 19501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
No it doesn't, rofl. The real question is whether Russia would use nukes if there was an eminent existential threat? There are many who don't even believe Russia would use nukes if it was faced with full-scale invasion.
Russia has continually threatened the west with it's nuclear arsenal, as if it has impunity, which it doesn't.

If we are destroyed then so is Russia including Putin and his family.

Russia is not going to be invaded, however if it sets a small tactical nuclear weapon off in Ukraine, then NATO would go in under a UN remit in order to help the survivors.

In terms of Russia's conventional forces they have turned out to be little more than a joke, and other than it's own mutual self destruction, Russia has few options but to withdraw from Ukraine and end it's pathetic and embarrassing so called special operation.

I also wouldn't be surprised if most of Russia's ageing cold war rusting nuclear missiles don't even work any more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2022, 06:15 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,558 posts, read 17,232,713 times
Reputation: 17599
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
This morning using "tactical" nuclear weapons in the Ukraine has become a topic of grave concern.

How do you think the allies will respond if Russia uses any nuclear weapons in Ukraine.
biden will respond,"stupidly", as is his foreign policy to abandon national security.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2022, 06:17 AM
 
30,167 posts, read 11,803,456 times
Reputation: 18688
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
Probably have to impeach Biden/Harris and get someone in charge with functional brains.
You impeach Biden/Harris and Nancy Pelosi will likely take over. Not sure that is an improvement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top