Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-18-2022, 05:24 AM
 
3,113 posts, read 940,134 times
Reputation: 1177

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Yes we are. I had no reaction to all the other vaccines, immunizations I've taken over the years so I go and get all the jabs.
The point is, "fully boosted" [had the new bivalent booster] are not doing well at all. They're testing + well out of proportion to their share of the population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-18-2022, 05:30 AM
 
4,858 posts, read 3,289,283 times
Reputation: 9487
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
As much as I love this data, I'm also more inclined to believe that the unvaccinated are also those that are less likely to run out and get a test. I know I've never been tested. The one cold I had a while back, it was over before I could have gotten anywhere to even BE tested.
I did take the initial vaccination and one booster. I expect I had COVID once very early on (pre shot) and once since then, both times like a more miserable case of flu. Never have been tested.

I'll look at this data presentation like I look at all ALL of the COVID related presentations... with my complete and absolute jaded belief that they say exactly what the 'presenter' wants them to say. Whether that's REALLY what they say or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2022, 01:59 PM
 
8,168 posts, read 3,131,022 times
Reputation: 4501
Wallgreen's

LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2022, 02:06 PM
 
8,168 posts, read 3,131,022 times
Reputation: 4501
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMSRetired View Post
Who would have ever thought That we would end up trusting drug store data over our own government?

And yet here we are
Has Wallgreens received any large government bailouts over the last few years? If so, this may explain why they are pushing the covid plandemic agenda so hard right now. The Wallgreen's Covid tv ads make me want to puke!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2022, 02:11 PM
 
3,048 posts, read 1,154,082 times
Reputation: 3718
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
As much as I love this data, I'm also more inclined to believe that the unvaccinated are also those that are less likely to run out and get a test. I know I've never been tested. The one cold I had a while back, it was over before I could have gotten anywhere to even BE tested.
I'm not sure why people are putting so much stock in Walgreen's numbers. I have taken a couple dozen tests over the last year because I have been traveling to see a relative who has metastatic cancer. I took all of the tests in the privacy of my own home and did not report the results because there was no reason to do so. Every single test was negative, and I've had all of the available vaccines and boosters.

Last edited by kj1065; 10-18-2022 at 02:36 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2022, 02:13 PM
 
3,113 posts, read 940,134 times
Reputation: 1177
Quote:
Originally Posted by FC76-81 View Post
Has Wallgreens received any large government bailouts over the last few years? If so, this may explain why they are pushing the covid plandemic agenda so hard right now. The Wallgreen's Covid tv ads make me want to puke!
They probably have, but without looking it up, they benefited anyway even if they didn't. With most stores closed to the lockdowns, Walgreens was opened. You need a vaccine? Can get one in Walgreens. You need a COVID test, come on down to Walgreens. You need those n95 or surgical masks? Why, Walgreens of course.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2022, 02:14 PM
 
3,113 posts, read 940,134 times
Reputation: 1177
Quote:
Originally Posted by kj1065 View Post
I'm not sure why people are putting much stock in Walgreen's numbers. I have taken a couple dozen tests over the last year because I have been traveling to see a relative who has metastatic cancer. I took all of the tests in the privacy of my own home and did not report the results because there was no reason to do so. Every single test was negative, and I've had all of the available vaccines and boosters.
I trust their numbers, but like you said, they're just Walgreen's numbers. They're only reporting numbers from people who got tested @ Walgreens. Never mind everyone who got tested somewhere else, or at their home, or didn't test at all.

But we have no reasons to believe their numbers are not representative for the larger US population who takes these tests.

I for one, will not test, unless it's required for me to do so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2022, 02:17 PM
 
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
17,666 posts, read 6,928,439 times
Reputation: 16580
Natural Immunity>”vaccine” immunity.

The science deniers who run the NIH, CDC and Democrat Party refuse to acknowledge basic scientific facts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2022, 02:22 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,153 posts, read 18,306,779 times
Reputation: 35028
Quote:
Originally Posted by kj1065 View Post
I'm not sure why people are putting much stock in Walgreen's numbers. I have taken a couple dozen tests over the last year because I have been traveling to see a relative who has metastatic cancer. I took all of the tests in the privacy of my own home and did not report the results because there was no reason to do so. Every single test was negative, and I've had all of the available vaccines and boosters.
And what does this have to do with Walgreen data ?

Governments stopped reporting when the number of vaccinated getting sick was greater than the unvaccinated.
About last August ....that's when my state stopped showing the numbers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2022, 02:25 PM
 
3,048 posts, read 1,154,082 times
Reputation: 3718
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMSRetired View Post
And what does this have to do with Walgreen data ?
Bad sampling. Home testing and non-reporting screwed up our ability to draw valid conclusions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top