Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I wonder what the liberal left in here have to say about Hillary's remarks? Afterall it is supposedly a threat to democracy to question any election results.
How can Ms. Clinton question election results that have not occurred yet? The only ones that have been erroneously questioning election results are the MAGAs--2+ years later. What Ms. Clinton is saying is that the right-wing controlled Supreme Court could allow states to throw away all votes and declare their preferred winner. This could/would happen in R controlled states. They are already setting up for this...
i didn't see hildawg called out even once on the deMSM for her latest election denialism. anyone else?
I would definitely have called her out had she filed 60 frivolous lawsuits, fomented an insurrection, sent a case up to the Supreme Court to try and have Clarence Thomas delay the election results, called and threatened election officials and secretaries of states and still be talking about it two years later. Sure, I'd call her out on it then. Until then, it's a nothing burger.
I would definitely have called her out had she filed 60 frivolous lawsuits, fomented an insurrection, sent a case up to the Supreme Court to try and have Clarence Thomas delay the election results, called and threatened election officials and secretaries of states and still be talking about it two years later. Sure, I'd call her out on it then. Until then, it's a nothing burger.
so election denial is fine and good unless there are additional factors involved?
so election denial is fine and good unless there are additional factors involved?
interesting. have you notified xoe?
I wouldn't have cared that Trump denied the election. It was all the other crap he pulled after that that was ridiculous. Deny if you want. Start filing bogus lawsuits, start insurrections, threaten people etc., then yeah, I think it becomes a problem.
I would definitely have called her out had she filed 60 frivolous lawsuits, fomented an insurrection, sent a case up to the Supreme Court to try and have Clarence Thomas delay the election results, called and threatened election officials and secretaries of states and still be talking about it two years later. Sure, I'd call her out on it then. Until then, it's a nothing burger.
The latest flurry of court actions brought by the Democratic National Committee and state Democratic parties — punctuated with a plea for relief late Sunday night to the Supreme Court
^^and here was another last ditch effort to not certify the election (*cough*)
Trump doesn't have an original bone in his body. Half of the stuff he accused democrats of and the media he stole from them.
And they kept going with that two years later? And they instigated a mob to stop the electoral count from happening? And they called election officials and secretaries of state, threatening them? Interesting.
Hillary is concerned because in all likelihood she'll be the Democratic nominee for President in 2024. I don't see anyone standing in her way.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
