Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-15-2022, 07:20 PM
 
3,495 posts, read 1,750,337 times
Reputation: 5512

Advertisements

Trump just said they reached 218 an hour ago, Kiley did it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-15-2022, 07:22 PM
 
Location: The 719
18,022 posts, read 27,468,060 times
Reputation: 17349
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Sure that was it.

That's why Boebert who was perceived as being a sho in in Colorado...barely won with 1100...and Oz lost and Walker is in a runoff in Georgia.

All because of Illinois.
Boebert a shoo-in? Really?

I live in Colorado. The democrats see her like we see AOC.

I see Boebert signs with KKK grafitti'd into them. She is hated amongst her opposition and she has a lot of dirt on her.

The classic justification for her from the Rs is this; as bad as she is, she's better than anything on the other side.

But Oz losing has to also mean Fedderman won and I'll leave that for y'all to explain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2022, 07:22 PM
 
Location: Florida
10,468 posts, read 4,042,712 times
Reputation: 8486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Igor Blevin View Post
All media sources still at 216 or 217.
Same media that says Trump's endorsements lost big when in fact 93% of his endorsements won?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2022, 07:24 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,703 posts, read 21,063,743 times
Reputation: 14252
Quote:
Originally Posted by McGowdog View Post
Boebert a shoo-in? Really?

I live in Colorado. The democrats see her like we see AOC.

I see Boebert signs with KKK grafitti'd into them. She is hated amongst her opposition and she has a lot of dirt on her.

The classic justification for her from the Rs is this; as bad as she is, she's better than anything on the other side.

But Oz losing has to also mean Fedderman won and I'll leave that for y'all to explain.
They talking recount. Only 1100 votes. The military votes could sway that with late mail ins. Not done here yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2022, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,253 posts, read 23,742,275 times
Reputation: 38639
Quote:
Originally Posted by McGowdog View Post
I agree here. Until I see GOP 218 or more, no celebration from me,

I have to see it from at least two sources of the following; CNN, Politico, ABC.

Decision Desk looks bunk to me. No 218, no party.

Let's finish this thing then we can start bleeping each others bleeps. Not a second sooner.

I already called the score; GOP 221, DNC 214. That's what the final will look like. It will probably come all the way down to DNC 213 before they'll eek out another one for the GOP.

But when it comes, don't worry, I'll let you know.

I'm not gonna start a bunk thread though.

We already got a sticky for this.

Another thing; when they lie, I don't give a flip. I could care less what they do. When we lie, it sickens me. A lie is a non-truth, a half-truth, and such as like. Let's have a standard to follow.
According to Politico, which is the one I've been using this whole time because they haven't been calling races where others have, the Dems would have to win every single race that is left to have 218.

https://www.politico.com/2022-election/results/house/

They are currently at 206, there are 12 races still being counted.

Of the likely and leans R, the races are:

CO - Boebert (R) 50.2%, Frisch (D) 49.8% 99% reporting. Maybe Frisch took an unnecessary trip.

CA - Valadao (R) 52.2%, Salas (D) 47.8% 62% reporting

CA - Kiley (R) 52.8%, Jones (D) 47.2% 57% reporting

CA - Garcia (R) 54.2% , Smith (D) 45.8% 70% reporting (finally)

Projected D in CA that is close:

Baugh (R) 49.2%, Porter (D) 50.8% 84% reporting.

Duarte (R) 49.8%, Gray (D) 50.2% 83% reporting.

Maryott (R) 47.47%, Levin (D) 52.5% 86% reporting. Hard to say if Maryott will catch up. It's not a lot of ballots in total. Right now it's 12,000 ballot difference. Probably won't win, but they do still have 10% more to go, and I don't feel like doing the math, but it could be close, as well, in the end.

Forgot about Maine:

Neither one has 50%. The reason is because the Independents voted 6.9% for Bond. Took a good chunk from them both.

ME - Poliquin (R) 44.9% Golden (D) 48.2% 99% reporting

Do they have to have one with 50% like the Senate, or do they just give it to Golden?

It's nice to see an Independent get that much in an election. Would be nice if that would continue to rise, and we saw that spread out all over the country.

Edit: While I was typing this post, the Dems got another seat. They are 207 to Rs 217, with 11 races still counting. It was not ME, AK, or CO, so it had to be an expected one in CA. It was not any that I listed above.

They will definitely get CA's 34th district because it's D vs D.

Last edited by Three Wolves In Snow; 11-15-2022 at 07:42 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2022, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,703 posts, read 21,063,743 times
Reputation: 14252
Quote:
Originally Posted by wp169 View Post
Trump just said they reached 218 an hour ago, Kiley did it.
They did ? Trump is the only source?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2022, 07:55 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,253 posts, read 23,742,275 times
Reputation: 38639
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinytrump View Post
They did ? Trump is the only source?
Yeah, it's way too early to make that call. Only 57% have been counted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2022, 08:40 PM
 
22,473 posts, read 12,003,345 times
Reputation: 20398
I found this article from "Business Insider" that was posted 4 hours ago:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...age=AA149tSc|7
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2022, 08:42 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,018,755 times
Reputation: 15559
It's not 218...Trump said lots of things that were wrong....lol. You know that.

But yes most definitely the Republicans will win the House.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2022, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Knoxville, TN
11,504 posts, read 6,008,999 times
Reputation: 22539
Fox Business is better than Fox News.

Fox Business still has not called the House of Representatives. They show the GOP stuck at 217 with 9 seats still in play.


https://www.foxbusiness.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top