Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I've always thought that the 1950-1975 period of cooling was attributed to Nuclear bomb testing (nuclear winter). We exploded hundreds if not thousands nuclear bombs in the atmosphere back then. Since the ban of atmospheric testing, there has been a rebound in temps. Makes some sense to me.
Back in the 1970s, the "consensus by the experts" was that we're entering a new ice age and believe it or not, they blamed carbon as being responsible for that cooling.
Well, if it was nuclear bomb testing, don't tell Biden. He'd be dropping bombs all over the US next thing we know.
The cool period actually extended a little longer than 1975. The winters here in 1976 and again in 1977 were the coldest consecutive years on record. As I recall, some scientists were even proposing dropping coal dust (or something black) on the polar regions so the ice would soak up more sun and melt everything. Then, next thing we know, we're into global warming. Kinda make a person wonder ....
The cool period actually extended a little longer than 1975. The winters here in 1976 and again in 1977 were the coldest consecutive years on record. As I recall, some scientists were even proposing dropping coal dust (or something black) on the polar regions so the ice would soak up more sun and melt everything. Then, next thing we know, we're into global warming. Kinda make a person wonder ....
Wow, I had not heard/read of that. That's amazing-ly stupid!
That line of thinking brings me back to today's crazy propositions of injecting sulfur dioxide capsules in the upper atmosphere and the latest news is that a start-up has done just that, from Mexico.
I think we should do all possible to clean up the oceans and rivers. I think we should stop using plastic and practice conservation and moving away from meat centric diets because it’s the worst for the environment. Just ask the poor people in NC about the dead pigs and tons and tons of pig poop being sprayed over fields. But I do not believe that not flying and driving is going to do jack for the climate.
And out of that 200,000 years of human history, we've only been able to build villages, hamlets and towns during the last 10,000 years.
And of the last 10,000 years, we had very very basic economies and trade up until about 500 years ago.
And in the last 500 years, basically everything we have today in terms of knowledge, living standards, government, laws, technology came into existence.
Now if somehow the robot drones who believe the globaloney warming con could turn on their logic centers long enough to soak up that information.
But the GW drones lack the power of reasoning, they are herded like sheep or cattle, wherever the trail boss wants them to go. Fear, panic, "emergency" will keep the cattle stampeding toward the slaughterhouse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by erieguy
They’ll believe whatever they’re told, especially it’s fearmongered enough.
Yes, this agitprop is drilled in from K onwards. Only now they're being twisted into thinking they're some make-believe gender. We live in truly dangerous times.
Suppose the temperature was to raise 2 degrees, what would actually happen? Do scientists even know?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.