Sound of freedom trafficker

[VLWH]

Originally Posted by DeadSpeak

https://www.newsweek.com/sound-freed...apping-1817498. Looks like the funder for sound of freedom is himself a pedophile, does this mean republicans will still be championing this movie?

Where does it say in the story the guy was a pedophile? I’ll wait.

[mattja]

Originally Posted by the_modern_philosopher

It was a funder, one person that funded it, not THE FUNDER.



He was "charged with accessory to child kidnapping". Not trafficing.



We don't need to love this guy, but lets be honest and accurate folks. Evil people hate this movie, really, evil people.

Honesty and accuracy are not trademarks of the groomer left.

[mattja]

Originally Posted by DeadSpeak

https://www.newsweek.com/sound-freed...apping-1817498. Looks like the funder for sound of freedom is himself a pedophile, does this mean republicans will still be championing this movie?

Seriously, do a little research and don't rely on MSM rags.

You made a fool of yourself for nothing.

[Mathguy]

Originally Posted by DeadSpeak

https://www.newsweek.com/sound-freed...apping-1817498. Looks like the funder for sound of freedom is himself a pedophile, does this mean republicans will still be championing this movie?

Considering he's neither charged as a pedo nor a trafficker, I reported your thread. It would get you sued as a reporter after all.

Maybe strive for some degree of honesty next time.

[michiganmoon]

Originally Posted by JerZ

Not at all. This is an agenda-driven grift, and it's horrifying that the plight of children is *used* for this purpose.

How so, be specific. The movie opposes child sex trafficking, something that you claim to also oppose.

We keep seeing leftists attack the movie nonsense. It is really weird.

P.S. The FBI should release Epstein's client list.

[Cape Cod Todd]

Originally Posted by gman6974

If that's the case democrats should be lined up for miles to support it.

Well they still Love Roman Polanski ?