Trump now Claims he will provide evidence of Election fraud that happened in Georgia next Monday at 11 am. (polls, dictators)

[wrecking ball]

Originally Posted by Boss

In fact he could just do a McCarthy hearing, say a bunch of lies and claim he is being targeted

maybe we'll get lucky and get another drunken performance from Melissa Carone.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2f3aw9rk30

[Malloric]

Originally Posted by Leo58

I guess you don't believe in the Constitution or in State's rights. The Constitution gives the states substantial leeway to decide how they run elections. The state of Texas has no business telling the state of Pennsylvania how to run their elections.

But what if Pennsylvania didn't vote right? Surely there should be a law against voting against the Dear Leader

[jacqueg]

Originally Posted by wrecking ball

maybe we'll get lucky and get another drunken performance from Melissa Carone.

Gosh, I'd forgotten all about her.

Turns out, she's run for state office three times since that precious performance. Lost once, was disqualified by the GOP twice. https://ballotpedia.org/Mellissa_Carone

[eddie gein]

Originally Posted by wrecking ball

yep. Trump put Kris Kobach in charge of finding proof that "millions" of illegal aliens illegally voted. Kobach couldn't find any. i wonder if the serious people are also waiting on that one.

These days the right wingers would have Kobach as a RINO who is part of the "conspiracy".

[VA Yankee]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

Like I said in the other thread... this SHOULD have been heard at SCOTUS. 18 State AGs sued 4 other states for holding unconstitutional federal elections in 2020. I have no idea WHY SCOTUS completely abdicated their Article III Constitutionally-mandated duty to resolve controversies between states by refusing to hear the case. The indictments against Trump and others are going to end up being BIG mistakes as clear evidence of the indisputable FACT that several states held unconstitutional federal elections in 2020 is going to be front and center as these cases go to court. Courts can't refuse to allow a defendant to present exculpatory evidence. That violates due process.

Those 18 state AG's have no standing to be suing other states over what they perceive was "unconstitutional federal elections" What happened is their prefered candidate lost, oh well....

There are no "indisputable FACTS" that any states Federal Elections were unconstitutional that's just your opinion. Trump will have his day in court and a chance to present real evidence not speculation, innuendo and hubris as he so frequently does.

[hooligan]

Originally Posted by Mojavedweller

Like Pablo Escobar. Mr. plata o ploma himself.

Plata o plomo.

Ploma is Catalan for feather, or a quill pen, according to Wiktionary.

[bluesjuke]

Originally Posted by Serious Conversation

The way I look at it is that he's just blanket accusing basically anywhere that was a swing state. He lost.

States not following Election Law and changing it illegally would upset me too yet that is what happened in several States.
That is fact.

[VA Yankee]

Originally Posted by bluesjuke

States not following Election Law and changing it illegally would upset me too yet that is what happened in several States.
That is fact.

Whats states and what facts are you referring to?

[wrecking ball]

Originally Posted by bluesjuke

States not following Election Law and changing it illegally would upset me too yet that is what happened in several States.
That is fact.

what court ruled changes were illegal?

[Indigo Cardinal]

I kinda hope Trump does spew his nonsense on Monday. I'm sure Jack and Fani will be paying close attention and taking notes, because odds are good, he'll snitch on himself again without even realizing it.