Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Always interesting to look up the CV's of the guys on these skeptic lists. Here we have a couple of hot shot theoretical physicists. But by the time we get to the third name...
Engineer guy has ties to oil and gas industry...
Funny how we never do the same with those tied to the anti-human "climate change movement". How many receive funding specifically to support the AGM theory? And lose funding when their "research" points to causes other than human activity?
Always interesting to look up the CV's of the guys on these skeptic lists. Here we have a couple of hot shot theoretical physicists. But by the time we get to the third name...
Engineer guy has ties to oil and gas industry...
Fourth dude... Masters in geophysics.
Fifth... Judge/Lawyer/Politician
I never see you posting about/questioning the CVs of people you agree with. Just when you want to discredit the other side. That's not debating. That's ignoring the actual topic and trying to shut down the discussion (in your own mind, at least). Once you've given yourself a reason to dismiss the people talking, it doesn't matter what they say or how truthful it is.
Hopefully some who have been manipulated by fear on the climate crisis will take the time to do some research of their own and listen to what others who actually understand science and how to interpret it have to say...
Can't ask more than that - otherwise might as well bury your head in the sand.
I never see you posting about/questioning the CVs of people you agree with. Just when you want to discredit the other side. That's not debating. That's ignoring the actual topic and trying to shut down the discussion (in your own mind, at least). Once you've given yourself a reason to dismiss the people talking, it doesn't matter what they say or how truthful it is.
It's important to do the homework on any position, pro or con to our own. There's usually some information that's indicative of scientific leanings available on most authorities, schools, departments within government, etc. It's useful to know - whether before or after reading a given text - where the author's sympathies lie.
Always interesting to look up the CV's of the guys on these skeptic lists. Here we have a couple of hot shot theoretical physicists. But by the time we get to the third name...
Engineer guy has ties to oil and gas industry...
Fourth dude... retired physics professor who does anti wind research
Fifth dude... Masters in geophysics.
Sixth... Judge/Lawyer/Politician in charge of energy "stuff" in NZ.
What a comprehensive analysis, eddie, 6 out of 1600!
But if you don’t mind sharing, I’m curious … what is your background that provides you with the academic/scientific credibility to dismiss all 1600 experts? Seems to me, you’re yet again on the wrong side of a debate.
For anyone who might be interested, each of those conclusions I have posted on numerous occasions over the past few years, every time one of the brainwashed dolts started another one of their “sky is falling” climate change threads.
But even as some of us knew this great awakening would eventually occur regarding many of the mainstream globalist lies, including AGW, we also knew a certain percentage would sleep right through it.
It's important to do the homework on any position, pro or con to our own. There's usually some information that's indicative of scientific leanings available on most authorities, schools, departments within government, etc. It's useful to know - whether before or after reading a given text - where the author's sympathies lie.
In the case this gigantic fraud of man made global warming is concerned, this has nothing to do with where one’s “sympathies” reside, but whether one does or does not have two functioning brain cells capable of shaking hands. Thats because this is, at the very foundational level, a very simple question of two basic choices:
1) CO2 being a dangerous substance that threatens the world, and must be eliminated from the atmosphere to avert an impending global calamity ……
OR
2) CO2 is the most essential gas to sustaining plant life on this planet, without which, everything would die, including all life reliant on the OXYGEN plants produce.
All the other arguments and debates are simply distractions by Bullšhit artists who somehow managed to convince a lot of real dumbasses and easily hoodwinked humans to promote their own extinction.
Of course there isn't. It's simply one of several social control mechanism put in place by tyrannical governments (and those clueless governments who just follow along). Sensible ecological and conservation efforts are a good thing. Extreme control measures piggybacking "save the world" hysteria are a very bad thing.
Well good, we have a letter signed by over 1600 scientists! There is no climate emergency-the science is settled!
(For those with poor memories-this is exactly what the wack-a-doos said when a similar number said that there was a climate "crisis" with a letter from a similar number of signatory).
"Science" is never settled. Objective and faithful science always questions; however, the global warming cult was the antithesis of science, that is for sure.
There was, and is, essentially no valid data to support the contention of AGW, yet liberals turned it into a new religion, which ignored and villified any information which refuted the claim.
Always interesting to look up the CV's of the guys on these skeptic lists. Here we have a couple of hot shot theoretical physicists. But by the time we get to the third name...
Engineer guy has ties to oil and gas industry...
Fourth dude... retired physics professor who does anti wind research
Fifth dude... Masters in geophysics.
Sixth... Judge/Lawyer/Politician in charge of energy "stuff" in NZ.
Next guy is a BS in geology who is a mining and metallurgy guy.
And so on.
But Al Gore and Greta Thunberg are very well qualified.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Investigation is a rational act
