Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I call BS on the USG folks, that goes directly against the usage terms they sign yearly.
You're not even supposed to go to gmail....
But, you've said this several times, if you can prove it, I'll say I'm wrong. But understand, I've been part of the USG and or associated with it since 1988. I've worked next to very high ranking folks, to include SES, 0-6 and up and I've never seen or even heard of doing any governmental business on gmail.
I am going to hazard a guess that the gmail accounts for USG users do not have a gmail.com domain, but a standard .gov, .mil, etc domain that maps to gmail.
I am going to hazard a guess that the gmail accounts for USG users do not have a gmail.com domain, but a standard .gov, .mil, etc domain that maps to gmail.
Thanks for the link, I'll check it out. 1 problem already is that we know that ole' joe domain was gmail domain, if not, would we be here?
And doing just a quick look, this is for GSA, NOT USG, even though GSA maybe a part of the USG, it has zero to do with the presdient, any person or rank that has the ability to deal with national security, etc.....
Thanks for the link, I'll check it out. 1 problem already is that we know that ole' joe domain was gmail domain, if not, would we be here?
And doing just a quick look, this is for GSA, NOT USG, even though GSA maybe a part of the USG, it has zero to do with the presdient, any person or rank that has the ability to deal with national security, etc.....
You drank the Kool aid. Each week Comer releases a statement that suggests maybe perhaps they might have found the smoking gun but they are still not able to prove that what they think might have happened actually happened. There is motive in suggesting these emails contain evidence without any indication they do
The court of public opinion is in session, and Joe Biden & his regime are sinking over the influence peddling scandal.
According to a recent YouGov poll, 52% of Independents think the Biden's are corrupt, and even 13% of those who voted for Joe, now think he's corrupt.
That poll came out before NARA admitted that they had 5,300 emails of Joe using aliases. Voters know aliases are used to deceive & conceal, so Joe's approval just sank even more.
If 52% of Indy's don't vote for Joe, & 13% less Dems vote for Joe Biden, he cannot be re-elected. Court adjourned.
I don't see Joe making it to Nov '24 as the #1 DNC candidate anyways. I think he's dumped by March '24. He's too old & corrupt, & his approval is down to 38% on the economy...says the liberal media.
And yet the National Archives will raid a ex-President's (Republican only) home to get what documents they want. The House should cut all funding to the National Archives until they comply.
If you have evidence of corruption, contact a US Attorney. You have no clue as to what rank and file employees want.
Yes I do. I know several employees of federal agencies, & they've told me the sentiment in DC, & the field offices they've been to. I also have read what the whistleblowers said. They said their co-workers felt the same as they did, but were afraid to come forward.
How about letting us know why Joe used several aliases? Why would he do that if he wasn't trying to deceive & conceal?
Joe's approval ratings are sinking like a rock, & that was before NARA admitted they had 4,300 of Joe's deceptive emails. We don't need to see the emails, just knowing Joe used aliases to deceive & conceal.
The Biden name has already been disgraced.
Nobody has to prove anything in any court for the Dems to lose power in the next national election. They are losing approval points each week this goes on, & there's stil over 58 weeks left until the election.
By March 2024, the DNC will turn the page on Joe Biden, they'll lose power by Nov '24.
Yes I do. I know several employees of federal agencies, & they've told me the sentiment in DC, & the field offices they've been to. I also have read what the whistleblowers said. They said their co-workers felt the same as they did, but were afraid to come forward.
How about letting us know why Joe used several aliases? Why would he do that if he wasn't trying to deceive & conceal?
Joe's approval ratings are sinking like a rock, & that was before NARA admitted they had 4,300 of Joe's deceptive emails. We don't need to see the emails, just knowing Joe used aliases to deceive & conceal.
The Biden name has already been disgraced.
Nobody has to prove anything in any court for the Dems to lose power in the next national election. They are losing approval points each week this goes on, & there's stil over 58 weeks left until the election.
By March 2024, the DNC will turn the page on Joe Biden, they'll lose power by Nov '24.
There is nothing wrong with a senior official using multiple email aliases. It is very common in industry and in government. I'm pretty sure that Trump had email aliases and didn't use donald.j.trump@whitehouse.gov as his main address.
IMHO, the Deepstate and its soldiers/supporters are going to pull-out anything and
everything to keep a Democrat in the Whitehouse.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The House should cut all funding to the National Archives until they comply.
