Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-14-2023, 09:21 AM
 
45,705 posts, read 27,308,055 times
Reputation: 23963

Advertisements

Defendant pleads guilty... max penalty 5 years prison

IRS Contractor Pleads Guilty to Disclosing Tax Return Information to News Organizations

An IRS contractor, Charles Littlejohn, 38, of Washington, D.C., pleaded guilty today to disclosing tax return information without authorization.

...
According to court documents, Littlejohn, while working at the IRS as a government contractor, stole tax return information associated with a high-ranking government official (Public Official A). Littlejohn accessed tax returns associated with Public Official A – and related individuals and entities – on an IRS database after using broad search parameters designed to conceal the true purpose of his queries. He then evaded IRS protocols established to detect and prevent large downloads or uploads from IRS devices or systems. Littlejohn then saved the tax returns to multiple personal storage devices, including an iPod, before contacting News Organization 1. Between around August 2019 and October 2019, Littlejohn provided News Organization 1 with the tax return information associated with Public Official A. Littlejohn then stole additional tax return information related to Public Official A and provided it to News Organization 1. In September 2020, News Organization 1 published a series of articles about Public Official A’s tax returns.

In July and August 2020, Littlejohn separately stole tax return information for thousands of the nation’s wealthiest individuals. Littlejohn was again able to evade IRS detection. In November 2020, Littlejohn disclosed this tax return information to News Organization 2, which published over 50 articles using the stolen data. Littlejohn then obstructed the forthcoming investigation into his conduct by deleting and destroying evidence of his disclosures.

Littlejohn pleaded guilty to unauthorized disclosure of tax return and return information. He is scheduled to be sentenced on Jan. 29, 2024, and faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison.


Haha... evade IRS detection, twice... good one...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-14-2023, 09:23 AM
 
Location: Western PA
10,945 posts, read 4,615,153 times
Reputation: 6824
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMSRetired View Post
Now they IRS can wipe their hands and say "See, we didn't do it"

the IRS does not prosecute unauthorized accesses - TIGTA does...ergo, this one is deep state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2023, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Western PA
10,945 posts, read 4,615,153 times
Reputation: 6824
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Defendant pleads guilty... max penalty 5 years prison

IRS Contractor Pleads Guilty to Disclosing Tax Return Information to News Organizations

An IRS contractor, Charles Littlejohn, 38, of Washington, D.C., pleaded guilty today to disclosing tax return information without authorization.

...
According to court documents, Littlejohn, while working at the IRS as a government contractor, stole tax return information associated with a high-ranking government official (Public Official A). Littlejohn accessed tax returns associated with Public Official A – and related individuals and entities – on an IRS database after using broad search parameters designed to conceal the true purpose of his queries. He then evaded IRS protocols established to detect and prevent large downloads or uploads from IRS devices or systems. Littlejohn then saved the tax returns to multiple personal storage devices, including an iPod, before contacting News Organization 1. Between around August 2019 and October 2019, Littlejohn provided News Organization 1 with the tax return information associated with Public Official A. Littlejohn then stole additional tax return information related to Public Official A and provided it to News Organization 1. In September 2020, News Organization 1 published a series of articles about Public Official A’s tax returns.

In July and August 2020, Littlejohn separately stole tax return information for thousands of the nation’s wealthiest individuals. Littlejohn was again able to evade IRS detection. In November 2020, Littlejohn disclosed this tax return information to News Organization 2, which published over 50 articles using the stolen data. Littlejohn then obstructed the forthcoming investigation into his conduct by deleting and destroying evidence of his disclosures.

Littlejohn pleaded guilty to unauthorized disclosure of tax return and return information. He is scheduled to be sentenced on Jan. 29, 2024, and faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison.


Haha... evade IRS detection, twice... good one...

not really, most of this is intentionally false. It is good to be king.



<on second thot, redacted> This is all online.


AND, 'GERS' (that is actually the acronym of the storage device protection) flags accesses as well with cyber. you cannot even charge your phone off the USB port without a security record being generated. As I said, it was known who, where, when the next day. It had to be suppressed from up high. you have exactly zero choice. Lois Lerner all over again.


not one person in the executive chain that signed off on this, will be punished in any way.


and of course, <redacted>, we are linkedin connected. such is the closed size of the knowledge circle. In a convo with my mgr friday I asked why I was not interviewed...they want this under the rug. again, its good to be king. treason is simply a matter of dates...


FWIW when the NYT story hit the wire 5 years ago, ALL of us at treasury - well ok, the non corrupt ones - asked how this is even possible. rulz, regs, statutes etc. we were told in writing, dont ask.


But...Trump!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2023, 12:50 PM
 
Location: Knoxville, TN
11,751 posts, read 6,124,466 times
Reputation: 22949
I am sure he will receive a very stern finger wag and "naughty boy! Now don't do it again and wash your hands before dinner," from Biden's DOJ.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2023, 05:38 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,460,721 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetireinPA View Post
so here is what happened, lets say he did this on the first monday in july 2018. Tuesday am and at 0-dark thrity, the log of all transactions was closed and rolled to the next day, a job somewhere ran that created a large set of datasets and it was washed.


Trump, like govt employees, has a protected TIN, so system accesses using his TIN kicked out. then the ID of the person who did the access was compared to see if they were assigned the TIN. BUT! in the case of the prez, only a very very small set of agents, and senior ones at that, can be assigned the prez records. so by 10am, noon at the latest, a set of 'alarms' (not really alarms, just emails notices with the outlook red ! showed up.) you cannot in any way, circumvent this system.


whomever got them went to their boss in TIGTA (lookitup) and probably a few bosses up and up and up until an obama appointee in both TIGTA and the IRS made the call to bury this. 2nd time in the last set of years the US taxpayers got bamboozled.



Because he pled guilty and accepted the max 5 year country club sentence (more like 9 months) and because a Soros shell corporation issued a 7 figure 1099 in his name, this will NEVER be looked at.


so given the parameters, by the first tuesday after the first monday in july of 2018, everyone knew WHO broke the law at WHAT time, and WHERE they were sitting.


But according to democrats, this is ok, because...welll TRUMP!


There are no dark recesses in the US govt where the DNC corruption is not present. none.
You missed the part that the return(data) wasn't selected by taxpayer ID info but by "broad search parameters". Huge flaw in the system, but sort of understandable no one thought to program for it.

Littlejohn pulled all the return data by searching for types of taxable income/amounts he knew or suspected would be on the returns he wanted.

The system only flags for unauthorized access when you pull by name or TIN and have no reason to be doing so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2023, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Western PA
10,945 posts, read 4,615,153 times
Reputation: 6824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
You missed the part that the return(data) wasn't selected by taxpayer ID info but by "broad search parameters". Huge flaw in the system, but sort of understandable no one thought to program for it.

Littlejohn pulled all the return data by searching for types of taxable income/amounts he knew or suspected would be on the returns he wanted.

The system only flags for unauthorized access when you pull by name or TIN and have no reason to be doing so.

no I didnt miss that, its not how the system works.


I have more, but Im 99.9% sure I cannot discuss it outside of the treasury walls and im 200% sure no one is cleared to hear it.


suffice to say, you cannot return the records, without alarms or put another way, since the 'breach' was discovered 5 years ago, how much was changed? exactly zero. this was driven by the deep state. Including the contractors placement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2023, 09:47 PM
 
15,569 posts, read 7,583,489 times
Reputation: 19460
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetireinPA View Post
the IRS does not prosecute unauthorized accesses - TIGTA does...ergo, this one is deep state.
TIGTA doesn't prosecute people, DoJ does, based on TIGTA investigations that are referred to DoJ. TIGTA doesn't have any prosecutors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2023, 09:50 PM
 
Location: Western PA
10,945 posts, read 4,615,153 times
Reputation: 6824
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRM20 View Post
TIGTA doesn't prosecute people, DoJ does, based on TIGTA investigations that are referred to DoJ. TIGTA doesn't have any prosecutors.
ok thats true, the irs does not investigate them, tigta does. but the point remains, they had to bury it. no one else could
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2023, 09:50 PM
 
15,569 posts, read 7,583,489 times
Reputation: 19460
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetireinPA View Post
no I didnt miss that, its not how the system works.


I have more, but Im 99.9% sure I cannot discuss it outside of the treasury walls and im 200% sure no one is cleared to hear it.


suffice to say, you cannot return the records, without alarms or put another way, since the 'breach' was discovered 5 years ago, how much was changed? exactly zero. this was driven by the deep state. Including the contractors placement.
What, exactly, is this so called "deep state" that Trump and his misguided followers keep harping on?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2023, 05:24 AM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,315 posts, read 18,428,133 times
Reputation: 35105
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRM20 View Post
What, exactly, is this so called "deep state" that Trump and his misguided followers keep harping on?
"Deep State" isn't something new with Trump.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_s..._United_States
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top