Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger
If we were talking about speech (not your right to it but just engaging in it) and you brought up the idea of heavily regulating it, you bet your ass that a solid portion of the board would be bringing up the fact that you were talking about a right, and they'd be correct in doing so.
"The 2nd Amendment isn't a second class right."
We don't intentionally introduce bad ideas into a discussion. We only do it if we think it's a good idea. You introduced the idea of regulating a right. Damn straight I'm going to point that out and I shouldn't be the only one who does.
"literally Hitler"
Doesn't matter what you've believed it to mean. It matters what the people who wrote it meant and that's been determined by SCOTUS. It's not a question anymore and continuing to pretend that "your understanding" is significant is willfully ignoring reality.
|
If you missed the title of that topics that on you its not an open discussion on 2A and no one said its a second class right. If you don't like my view of gun ownership oh well that's what the topic was asking, not if you approve or not. What Hilter its not a name I used,?
You want to get into a 2A argument then start another one on this board. I'm fine with my ability to read what was written and i'll leave it at that whether you agree or not.