Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hope they are not being used to make paper towels and TP.
No. They don't even get used for firewood. These are big shade trees in the cities and suburbs that are getting removed. One even sees trees being removed from farmland. Well, I shouldn't say that none of the trees removed get used for firewood. What I've seen though is large trees being fed into the chippers.
But we must subsidize coal powered EVs so save the planet. Well, they've stopped the subsidies. Nothing wrong with using coal to power vehicles. Some of it is even locally mined which makes sense.
Well the armchair City Data climate scientists have spoken. In the real world the global climate experts universally agree that Climate Change is real and a threat to our environment. Political right wing propaganda distorts everything.
Well the armchair City Data climate scientists have spoken. In the real world the global climate experts universally agree that Climate Change is real and a threat to our environment. Political right wing propaganda distorts everything.
Actually, it's the political left wing propaganda that distorts everything. There is a threat to our environment by 'climate change' is not it. Climate stupidity is a greater threat although more for socio-economic stability.
So 'climate change' is real. Ok, so now what? What do we do about it? Chop down more forests to put up wind farms? What's wrong with just developing more efficient use of the fuels we do use? What's wrong with just stopping the forest destruction and embarking on restoring and expanding forests?
Actually, it's the political left wing propaganda that distorts everything. There is a threat to our environment by 'climate change' is not it. Climate stupidity is a greater threat although more for socio-economic stability.
So 'climate change' is real. Ok, so now what? What do we do about it? Chop down more forests to put up wind farms? What's wrong with just developing more efficient use of the fuels we do use? What's wrong with just stopping the forest destruction and embarking on restoring and expanding forests?
Most of the giant forest fires we've been having are man made. Many from electric wires. These areas need underground wires, not overhead.
No, the trees and plants are doing their part. You are just generating a lot of hot air, which the trees and plants very much appreciate, by trading their oxygen you need for your CO2 that they need.
so shut the frack up !
more Beer ! Because Murica !
Don't worry guys this should help the environment.
Quote:
The U.S. Coast Guard said Monday that an estimated 1.1 million gallons of crude oil has leaked into the Gulf of Mexico near a pipeline off the coast of Louisiana. Officials are concerned about the oil's potential impact on endangered and threatened species.
Come on now, that’s an absurd suggestion. Clearly, the prominent voices among the Climate Change Con Artists are all claiming a dire need to take immediate action to avoid an impending catastrophe, and it’s not editorializing by the media … it’s media regurgitating the Climate Cultists catastrophic claims.
Those Climate Cultists you're talking about - Al Gore and Greta Thurnberg come to mind - are not scientists. Actual scientists give us the facts: the climate is warming. They don't tell us what to do about it. That's for politicians to decide.
Because all proposed actions to combat “climate change” revolves around dramatic reductions in man-made Carbon Dioxide to “near zero” that’s why! And, in the off chance that anyone needs a reminder …. human beings exhale CO2. Therefore, those who are pushing this agenda are literally saying that a lot of human beings need to stop breathing, in round about terms, without actually saying it. That’s why it’s a bad idea.
But for all of the staunch advocates for eliminating man-made CO2, you go first. You do your “tiny part” and stop breathing.
Now you are just being silly. The amount of carbon dioxide that you exhale in your breath is miniscule compared to the amount released by burning a gallon of gas. No one is proposing that we need fewer breathing humans to reduce climate change.
I doubt if we'll ever completely wean ourselves off fossil fuels. But if we could convert a large percentage of our energy sources to renewables, which are cleaner, more reliable, ultimately more efficient and don't impact the climate, why would we not want to do that?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
yes
