Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But their hero, Ollie North sold them weapons and parts. Reagan claimed he didn’t know about it. So he’s off the hook.
Reagan didn't know whether it was elbow or breakfast. That being said, Fox making Oliver North a featured presenter really made it clear where their loyalties are, and it's not with the country. I'll let people draw their own conclusions as to what that says about Fox viewers.
The immunity at issue is immunity for actions taken in the official capacity as president.
If the president blows up a hospital trying to bomb ISIS, that’s immunity.
If the president makes a personal financial deal with China, that’s called collusion and corruption and is not immunity. And the president could be impeached.
There is no “immunity from actions taken in the official capacity” if those actions are illegal, intentional, and corrupt.
Quote:
Abscam, sometimes written ABSCAM, was an FBI sting operation in the late 1970s and early 1980s that led to the convictions of seven members of the United States Congress and others for bribery and corruption.
The kind of immunity that Trump's legal team argued in front of the DC appeals court? No president is a King, but the Supreme Court could make it that way if they rule in Trump's favor.
"Trump team argues assassination of rivals is covered by presidential immunity. Former President Trump's legal team suggested Tuesday that even a president directing SEAL Team Six to kill a political opponent would be an action barred from prosecution given a former executive's broad immunity to criminal prosecution"
Is putting a fake congressional hearing on tv where a young woman “testifies” that the enemy is throwing babies out of hospital incubators corrupt? Turns out she was the daughter of the ambassador to the US. Worked for H.
Is negotiating with Iran to get them to wait to release hostages in order to enhance your election for POTUS corrupt? Worked for Reagan.
is lying about WMD and who caused 9-11 in order to invade Iraq corrupt? Worked for W and saved Cheney’s deferred compensation with Halliburton. They were about to go under until they got all those no bid contracts.
You wanna talk corruption? A person on the White House staff getting a 2 billion dollar contract with SA when he leaves government employ kind of corruption? Biden and son are pikers compared to Kushner. Kushner is the investor who is so bright he bought a building where the rent for 100% leased would not throw off enough money to make the payments.
Why would we give immunity to any president. That means they could do whatever they wanted in office even if it was against the law. But once they are out of office they are citizens just like the rest of us. And that’s how they should be treated
For the same reason that members of Congress, both Houses, have immunity while Congress is in session.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,507 posts, read 12,509,523 times
Reputation: 10454
Quote:
Originally Posted by kell490
The kind of immunity that Trump's legal team argued in front of the DC appeals court? No president is a King, but the Supreme Court could make it that way if they rule in Trump's favor.
"Trump team argues assassination of rivals is covered by presidential immunity. Former President Trump's legal team suggested Tuesday that even a president directing SEAL Team Six to kill a political opponent would be an action barred from prosecution given a former executive's broad immunity to criminal prosecution"
What would the left media be like without their propaganda?
It appears that the 'real' question was not about immunity, this was the actual question:
"Could a President order SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political rival?"
<side note, the question is talking about a "political rival" and not about those who are putting our national security at risk, like known terrorists, etc.>
To which Trump's lawyer said [a President] "would have to be and would speedily be impeached and convicted before the criminal prosection".
That ignorant question, that those judges had asked Trump and that the left media is spinning, was slapped down by three former high-ranking military leaders.
If YES, what do you think about Trump's latest post today on TruthSocial?:
At what point are the actions of a sitting President, using LAWFARE against his opponent for purposes of Election Interference, considered ILLEGAL? I believe, as do various highly respected legal scholars, that Crooked Joe Biden has long since crossed over that very sacred threshold!!!
HILARIOUS!!!!
So what you are saying is that you will approve of "lawfare" and incessant attacks on Biden after he leaves office?
Give me a break. Liberals have created an unprescedented abuse of the legal system in their attacks on Trump. I HOPE that democrats are victims of the same abuses in the future.
So what you are saying is that you will approve of "lawfare" and incessant attacks on Biden after he leaves office?
Give me a break. Liberals have created an unprescedented abuse of the legal system in their attacks on Trump. I HOPE that democrats are victims of the same abuses in the future.
It's a hypothetical question. I do not believe a president should enjoy unlimited immunity. The idea on its very face is quite insane.
Comer's failure to articulate the Biden crime is a wonder to behold--on Fox News, no less. It's really taking a lot of wind out of his sails.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.