Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old Yesterday, 12:38 PM
Status: "Wasting time in the internet. Just like you." (set 2 days ago)
 
Location: Preskitt
1,258 posts, read 636,809 times
Reputation: 1009

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rantiquity View Post
Canada doesn't have the same constitutional rights as Americans. There has been laws in effect on free speech for years in Canada.
Yet another example of where the left would take things without constitutional protections, and a Supreme Court to uphold them.

Scratch a progressive, reveal a tyrant.

Our 1st and 2nd amendments are 1st and 2nd for damn good reasons.

Last edited by AZ Desert Guy; Yesterday at 12:58 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old Yesterday, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,286 posts, read 18,664,972 times
Reputation: 25865
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRM20 View Post
That law would be unconstitutional due to the first amendment and the prohibition of ex post facto laws.
All gun laws except the 2nd Amendment are Unconstitutional, yet they stand and have for decades and decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 02:22 PM
 
Location: USA
18,524 posts, read 9,204,671 times
Reputation: 8548
“This man was arrested for being in too many bad moods.”

— From the 1995 movie Canadian Bacon, at the Mountie Headquarters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 03:42 PM
 
Location: NJ
23,627 posts, read 17,309,078 times
Reputation: 17673
oh canada, full on communist country!

they can use the concentration camps where they held german prisoners during WW2. Most of canada would be behind bars.

megan markle needs to flee to canada to enjoy protection from criticism!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 05:32 PM
 
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
11,087 posts, read 6,033,201 times
Reputation: 5735
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankNSense View Post
Blackface Trudeau better be careful what he wishes for.

Just sayin'
Well you saw what happened to Humza Yousaf's new hate speech law. Nearly 4,000 complaints were laid against him in the first 24 hrs for his hate speech in parliament. That's the one that J.K. Rowling defied. She won. Now Himza Hazbeen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 05:49 PM
 
Location: MN
6,595 posts, read 7,205,270 times
Reputation: 5854
Biden is on video being racist, he should be the first one charged if it comes here. Trudeau did blackface, so he’ll be Canada’s first one charged too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 08:31 PM
 
16,712 posts, read 8,703,104 times
Reputation: 19531
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpinionInOcala View Post
You should've highlighted the scariest parts of the bill, like the potential for life imprisonment for committing speech violations. Or, being forced to wear a tracker and submit to bodily fluid testing because somebody merely reports you because they 'think' you will commit a thought/speech crime. Canada's leftists want to stop just short of out-kooking North Korea.
The irony is that by and large, some of the most friendly and inoffensive people I know are Canadians. I don't go to Canada often, but when I have, everyone is exceedingly nice.
The ones I've met as tourists in the USA are the same way.
So to think they need some Orwellian speech police to lock up those not in conformity with whatever the government of the day deems inappropriate, is well beyond the pale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 08:37 PM
 
20,225 posts, read 20,998,850 times
Reputation: 16955
Canada sucks. They can’t even do bacon right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 09:16 PM
 
15,589 posts, read 7,620,110 times
Reputation: 19474
Quote:
Originally Posted by rantiquity View Post
Canada doesn't have the same constitutional rights as Americans. There has been laws in effect on free speech for years in Canada.
And hate speech laws have been on the books in America for years. Just not to that extent.
I should have added that those laws would have been unconstitutional in the United States
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 09:40 PM
 
Location: Canada
7,690 posts, read 5,558,209 times
Reputation: 8827
So Americans are in favor of allowing everything the bill is designed to prevent?

Quote:
On February 26, 2024, the Government of Canada introduced Bill C-63 to create a new Online Harms Act—a baseline standard for online platforms to keep Canadians safe—to hold online platforms accountable for the content they host. Bill C-63 will create stronger protections for kids online and better safeguard everyone in Canada from online hate. The bill sets out a new vision for safer and more inclusive participation online.

The proposed Online Harms Act would specifically target seven types of harmful content:

* Content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor;
* Intimate content communicated without consent;
* Content used to bully a child;
* Content that induces a child to harm themselves;
* Content that foments hatred;
* Content that incites violence; and
* Content that incites violent extremism or terrorism.

Under the Act, social media services would be subject to three duties:

* A duty to act responsibly;
* A duty to protect children; and
* A duty to make certain content inaccessible, specifically (1) content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor and (2) intimate images posted without consent.

These duties would apply to social media services including livestreaming and user-uploaded adult content services. They would require these services to actively reduce the risk of exposure to harmful content on their services; to provide clear and accessible ways to flag harmful content and block users; to put in place special protections for children; to take action to address child sexual exploitation and the nonconsensual posting of intimate content, including deepfake sexual images; and to publish transparency reports.

The Bill also proposes changes to the Criminal Code, the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA), and An Act respecting the mandatory reporting of internet child pornography by persons who provide an internet service.
https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-he...ne-harms.html#
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top