Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-07-2008, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,605,313 times
Reputation: 1680

Advertisements

Deleted message: Hey genius You want to power cars, airplanes, produce plastics and fertilizers with coal?

Exxon and Chevron are not interested in American oil shale, it will probably never be possible to exploit it. Horribly expensive in financial and ecological terms, cost in the hundreds of dollars per barrel.

In 2020-2035, there won't be any cheap oil left to develop better technology. We will have other priorities, renewable, clean energy.


Who cares what they're interested in? The American people have an energy source that sits in it's borders. This is your argument? Cheap oil is the resource we have to develop new technology? The fallacy in this logic goes all the way back to George Washington Carver and BEYOND. Oil Shale was estimated at one time as a resource that could provide the US with oil at $10.00 per barrel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-07-2008, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,605,313 times
Reputation: 1680
I apologize - Coal is a rock, oil shale is a rock, both are in the ground. Their are incredibly large deposits of Natural Gas in the immediate vicinity of Oil Shale. The Gas companies know this. Research.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2008, 09:47 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,428,613 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
Who cares what they're interested in? The American people have an energy source that sits in it's borders. This is your argument? Cheap oil is the resource we have to develop new technology? The fallacy in this logic goes all the way back to George Washington Carver and BEYOND. Oil Shale was estimated at one time as a resource that could provide the US with oil at $10.00 per barrel.


This $10.00/bbl estimate was when? Carver's time?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2008, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,605,313 times
Reputation: 1680
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/rpt/oilshale1.JPG (broken link)

"You'd never guess that the whole stretch of brown, red, and orange land contains enough recoverable oil and
gas to make you forget about the Middle East for the rest of time."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2008, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,605,313 times
Reputation: 1680
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
This $10.00/bbl estimate was when? Carver's time?
I saw the report A year ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2008, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,605,313 times
Reputation: 1680
"Most of the nation's oil shale reserves rest under the control of the U.S. government - a legacy of a 95-year old
Congressional Act. In 1910, Congress passed the Pickett Act, which authorized President Taft to set aside oil-
bearing land in California and Wyoming as potential sources of fuel for the U.S. Navy. Taft did so right away. The Navy
was in the process of switching from coal burning ships to oil burning ships. And the U.S. military, conscious of the
expanding role of America in the world, needed a dependable supply of fuel in case of a national emergency.
From 1910 to 1925 the Navy developed the Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Program. The program became official in 1927 and President Roosevelt even expanded the scope of the program in 1942 as the U.S. geared up for war with Japan and Germany.
Several of the oil fields set aside for the nation's first strategic reserve, particularly Elk Hills in California,
would go on to produce oil for the U.S. government. Elk Hills was eventually sold off to Occidental Petroleum for
$3.65 billion in 1998 in the largest privatization in U.S. history. The shale reserves, however, still remain, locked
1,000 feet underground in the Colorado desert."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2008, 09:53 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,428,613 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
I saw the report A year ago.


I find it difficult to believe that if $10.00/bbl, let's be generous and allow $30.00, that if this is a reasonable estimate that there's not a HUGE influx of men and equipment to the area right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2008, 09:57 AM
 
413 posts, read 782,860 times
Reputation: 119
Shell cancels oil-shale mining permit request in Colorado - AutoblogGreen

Quote:
Shale oil in particular is likely to cost well over $100/barrel, a price point that makes almost any alternative much less expensive.

In discussions with people in the auto industry, no one seems to believe shale, coal to liquid or any of these synthetic oil projects are viable or desirable replacements for crude.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2008, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,605,313 times
Reputation: 1680
We see what we wish to see. Research.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2008, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,605,313 times
Reputation: 1680
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
I find it difficult to believe that if $10.00/bbl, let's be generous and allow $30.00, that if this is a reasonable estimate that there's not a HUGE influx of men and equipment to the area right now.
Why be generous? it is what it is - I prefer fair over generous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top