What not to do if you are a climate scientist (global warming, revolution)

[Nomander]

This is an interesting blog write up concerning the issues with climate science that I have been posting in the global warming threads from time to time. Most people do not like to read Climate Audit due to its extreme focus on the math which can leave a lot of people who are not versed on the topics with their head spinning.

More specifically, this write up is a casual and comical easy to read approach to the issues that CA has brought up, more specifically with the current release of Casper Amman's SI. I won't explain it for you because it does a very good job of laying out the issues in an easy to understand way that might just provoke a *chuckle* or two.

Enjoy!

- Bishop Hill blog - Caspar and the Jesus*paper

[GregW]

I read the article and wonder how much the author was paid to cast doubt on the original observation that worldwide atmospheric CO2 concentration has rapidly increased since the start, and if you follow the recent article in WISC news, not only of the Industrial Revolution, but the earliest development of human civilization. The references article is a summary of a criticism of the CO2/Temperature "Hockey Stick" based on one person's interpretation of the statistical minutia of the original papers.

I consider the criticism to be deliberately misleading pseudo scientific nonsense created as part of a very well organized effort to reverse any consideration of the world wide climate in political and economic policy discussions.

[Nomander]

Originally Posted by GregW

I read the article and wonder how much the author was paid to cast doubt on the original observation that worldwide atmospheric CO2 concentration has rapidly increased since the start, and if you follow the recent article in WISC news, not only of the Industrial Revolution, but the earliest development of human civilization. The references article is a summary of a criticism of the CO2/Temperature "Hockey Stick" based on one person's interpretation of the statistical minutia of the original papers.

I consider the criticism to be deliberately misleading pseudo scientific nonsense created as part of a very well organized effort to reverse any consideration of the world wide climate in political and economic policy discussions.

And yet.. climate keeps on pissing in the face of those you claim have it all figured out.

Imagine that.

Nice that you responded to this a couple of years later. Heck I just noticed you happened to do so while I was doing some spring cleaning, two years after you responded. LOL

/boggle