Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 08-22-2008, 07:39 PM
 
Location: Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania USA
2,308 posts, read 2,587,068 times
Reputation: 369

Advertisements

Quote:
OMAHA, Neb. — Nebraska's new safe-haven law allowing parents to abandon unwanted children at hospitals with no questions asked is unique in a significant way: It goes beyond babies and potentially permits the abandonment of anyone under 19.
While lawmakers may not have intended it, the month-old law raises the possibility that frustrated parents could drop off misbehaving teens or even severely disabled older children with impunity.
So..., what's next, dropping of grandma and grandpa; unwanted in-laws; overstayed visitors; the dead dog...! Just when I thought that our Marxist society couldn't sink any lower...!

FOXNews.com - Nebraska Safe-Haven Law Permits Parents to Abandon Teens - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-22-2008, 07:55 PM
 
8,185 posts, read 12,637,996 times
Reputation: 2893
I see where you are coming from, stevehazzard....but for me that alternative of dead babies in toilets is far worse.

As far as dumping off their teens...well, teens do know their names and where they live so chances are they would just make their ways back home . And disabled children, wow, that is a sad possibility. On the other hand, a disabled girl was killed her in a fire recently because her mother locked in her in the basement. Imagine dying of third degree burns.

A sorry business all the way around.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2008, 08:59 PM
 
Location: Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania USA
2,308 posts, read 2,587,068 times
Reputation: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by camping! View Post
I see where you are coming from, stevehazzard....but for me that alternative of dead babies in toilets is far worse.

As far as dumping off their teens...well, teens do know their names and where they live so chances are they would just make their ways back home . And disabled children, wow, that is a sad possibility. On the other hand, a disabled girl was killed her in a fire recently because her mother locked in her in the basement. Imagine dying of third degree burns.

A sorry business all the way around.
I'm sorry to tell you that these "abandoned baby laws" really don't work and IMO, are just a collective social method of tempering the results of the real problem which is unwanted babies and pregnancies. Our degenerative society has so glamorized the condition of pregnancy to a "status symbol", especially among teens, that it completely ignores the result of that pregnancy which is a human being and now being pregnant has lost all its glamor as a child needs to be "disposed of".
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2008, 09:28 PM
 
Location: in my mind
2,743 posts, read 14,295,043 times
Reputation: 1627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Hazzard View Post
I'm sorry to tell you that these "abandoned baby laws" really don't work and IMO, are just a collective social method of tempering the results of the real problem which is unwanted babies and pregnancies. Our degenerative society has so glamorized the condition of pregnancy to a "status symbol", especially among teens, that it completely ignores the result of that pregnancy which is a human being and now being pregnant has lost all its glamor as a child needs to be "disposed of".
Okay, I'm sorry, but this makes no sense.

Either pregnancy is glamorized or it isn't.

Also, how do you figure the laws don't work? No, they are NOT going to solve every issue of babies in dumpsters, but if ONE young mother chooses to take advantage of a Safe Haven law instead of panicking and throwing her baby in the TRASH, then it has succeeded in the original goal, don't you think??? And babies HAVE been surrendered this way and some states HAVE reported a decrease in newborn deaths since these laws were implemented.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2008, 06:13 AM
 
Location: Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania USA
2,308 posts, read 2,587,068 times
Reputation: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by fierce_flawless View Post
Okay, I'm sorry, but this makes no sense.

Either pregnancy is glamorized or it isn't.

Also, how do you figure the laws don't work? No, they are NOT going to solve every issue of babies in dumpsters, but if ONE young mother chooses to take advantage of a Safe Haven law instead of panicking and throwing her baby in the TRASH, then it has succeeded in the original goal, don't you think??? And babies HAVE been surrendered this way and some states HAVE reported a decrease in newborn deaths since these laws were implemented.
I'm referring to the celerity and Hollywood types that have glamorized being pregnant as a way of furthering their careers, just take a look at the recent pregnancies of Jennifer Lopez, Jamie Lynn Spears and Angelina Jollie. The entertainment media then hypes these pregnancies and young girls look at being pregnant as a peer status symbol, for example, the high school teens in Gloucester, MA that thought it would be fun to be pregnant at the same time and raise their babies together. Unfortunately, the "fun" quickly disappeared when the teens realized that there would be a human being to care for as a result of their pregnancies.

IMO, the safe haven laws have encouraged unwanted pregnancies, especially in teens, because these "girls" know that after the "fun" of being pregnant no longer exists, they can always dispose of the baby, no questions asked, when they are faced with the reality of caring for a child. The fact that the baby can be put up for adoption is a good thing, encouraging teens to have "fun pregnancies" is not so good.

Last edited by Steve Hazzard; 08-23-2008 at 06:17 AM.. Reason: Edit text.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2008, 07:01 AM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,761,129 times
Reputation: 3587
OMAHA, Neb. — Nebraska's new safe-haven law allowing parents to abandon unwanted children at hospitals with no questions asked is unique in a significant way: It goes beyond babies and potentially permits the abandonment of anyone under 19.

Last I knew you are a legal adult on your 18th birthday so you can dump them at 18 anytime!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2008, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,968,624 times
Reputation: 36644
I am anxiously awaiting the detailed explanation from the non-Marxists about how to improve the welfare of unwanted dependents in dysfunctional households, who are subjected to everything from neglect to brutality, through no fault of their own.

And please don't read me the standard rolodex talking point that if everyone exercised responsibility, there would be no problem. Like, if every student got straignt As, all our school problems would be solved.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2008, 08:05 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,747,599 times
Reputation: 35920
I interpret Steve's comments about glamorizing pregnancy to mean that pregnancy is glamorized with little thought given to childrearing. All these Hollywood babies are being raised by nannies, if they're lucky, and by no-one, if they're not.

Safe haven laws have not worked well in Colorado. Babies are still abandoned instead of being taken to the hospital, fire station, etc.

Maybe we need some respite places to drop teens for a few days/weeks!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2008, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,968,624 times
Reputation: 36644
Until a year ago, I lived in a medium sized city (I will not identify it, for its own protection) that had hundreds of "homeless" teens. There is a municipal shelter for homeles teens, that is currently expanding to over 100 beds. This is a city of less than 100,000 people. In addition to those in the shelter, there are coultless teens who are, temporarily or permanantly, living with the families of their school friends. Just taken in as a gesture of good will and benefaction. This has actually become a way of life in this city, where it is widely recognized and generally sanctioned by the populace. The city has a very low crime rate, and teens generally are pretty good about staying out of trouble.

By the way, another forward-looking aspect to this city. The public school system has established, free of charge, day-care for any girl who gives birth to a child before she graduates from high school and who wishes to continue her education. She is free, during school hours, to visit her child in the daycare center, which is located in the high school.

The median income in this city is 5K below the state median. Yet, the people are more than willing to direct their tax dollars to what they see as worthwhile social expenditures.

Last edited by jtur88; 08-23-2008 at 08:31 AM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2008, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania USA
2,308 posts, read 2,587,068 times
Reputation: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
Until a year ago, I lived in a medium sized city (I will not identify it, for its own protection) that had hundreds of "homeless" teens. There is a municipal shelter for homeles teens, that is currently expanding to over 100 beds. This is a city of less than 100,000 people. In addition to those in the shelter, there are coultless teens who are, temporarily or permanantly, living with the families of their school friends. Just taken in as a gesture of good will and benefaction. This has actually become a way of life in this city, where it is widely recognized and generally sanctioned by the populace. The city has a very low crime rate, and teens generally are pretty good about staying out of trouble.

By the way, another forward-looking aspect to this city. The public school system has established, free of charge, day-care for any girl who gives birth to a child before she graduates from high school and who wishes to continue her education. She is free, during school hours, to visit her child in the daycare center, which is located in the high school.

The median income in this city is 5K below the state median. Yet, the people are more than willing to direct their tax dollars to what they see as worthwhile social expenditures.
Your post describes a socialized country, particularly, any of the Scandinavian countries. This is known as "cradle to grave" government care. This may work well in a socialized country because of it's size and homogeneous population, but socialism will not work in a capitalistic society such as the US. Should Nobama-Biden be elected to the White House, Americans will get a bitter taste of just how socialism is dysfunctional in a capitalistic country.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top