Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-04-2008, 05:07 PM
 
Location: S.Florida
3,326 posts, read 5,353,646 times
Reputation: 343

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donn2390 View Post
Whatever it takes..... This is war, not playground rules... You do what has to be done to solve the problem....

I understand but in attempting to solve the problem you do not want to create more problems.

What if Pakistan tells us to go to heal and now they arm the Tali same way they did to keep the Russian's at bay.

What if they give them what they need to hit our chopper's,etc. To go in and impose our will in Pakistan could blow up in our face.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-04-2008, 05:15 PM
 
2,751 posts, read 5,375,936 times
Reputation: 1779
If the U.S. would have nabbed Bin Laden before the Spring of '03, how much support would George Bush have had for the Iraq war, considering how successfully he and his administration tied 911 to that invasion?

And if we do get him now, how many of us American voters will be sufficiently suspicious of the timing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2008, 05:17 PM
 
Location: S.Florida
3,326 posts, read 5,353,646 times
Reputation: 343
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExPit View Post
If the U.S. would have nabbed Bin Laden before the Spring of '03, how much support would George Bush have had for the Iraq war, considering how successfully he and his administration tied 911 to that invasion?

And if we do get him now, how many of us American voters will be sufficiently suspicious of the timing?
---------------

Great point so true. Bush real objective was Iraq anyway was never Osama .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2008, 05:21 PM
 
2,751 posts, read 5,375,936 times
Reputation: 1779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luiso View Post
---------------

Great point so true. Bush real objective was Iraq anyway was never Osama .
You know we had him, had Bin Laden cornered early on, and backup was requested to get him while the getting was good. That backup never came. Sometimes things are just what they seem. This war has been the most privatized of all wars ever. More money has been made than ever before. Coincidence, I think not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2008, 09:44 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
799 posts, read 1,449,209 times
Reputation: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luiso View Post
I understand but in attempting to solve the problem you do not want to create more problems.

What if Pakistan tells us to go to heal and now they arm the Tali same way they did to keep the Russian's at bay.

What if they give them what they need to hit our chopper's,etc. To go in and impose our will in Pakistan could blow up in our face.


Agreed, we should not anger a nuclear armed country by killing their citizens and ignoring their borders. I can't tell the difference between an armed Pakistani civilian and an armed terrorist, neither can our government. We should be working with Pakistan and not against them. They are our allies and they should be treated as allies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 06:56 AM
 
4,173 posts, read 6,703,294 times
Reputation: 1216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majordomo View Post
Agreed, we should not anger a nuclear armed country by killing their citizens and ignoring their borders. I can't tell the difference between an armed Pakistani civilian and an armed terrorist, neither can our government. We should be working with Pakistan and not against them. They are our allies and they should be treated as allies.
A lot of Pakistanis do not like the US. But, many in the cities (their "liberals") are against the extreme right. Mush milked the US relationship for money and arms, and did not do much against terrorists. Calling them an ally would be a serious stretch - they do not behave as one. They are still creating a lot of trouble in Afghanistan - Karzai's statements confirm that. If it were not for their support, taliban etc would simply not exist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Northeast TN
3,885 posts, read 8,140,447 times
Reputation: 3658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donn2390 View Post
Whatever it takes..... This is war, not playground rules... You do what has to be done to solve the problem....
I can see just how well this has been working. Which problem have we solved?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Northeast TN
3,885 posts, read 8,140,447 times
Reputation: 3658
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExPit View Post
If the U.S. would have nabbed Bin Laden before the Spring of '03, how much support would George Bush have had for the Iraq war, considering how successfully he and his administration tied 911 to that invasion?

And if we do get him now, how many of us American voters will be sufficiently suspicious of the timing?
He's dead. There's no boogyman to get. You know, I wish we could all just be honest. I wish Bush had the guts[mod edited] to say, "He's dead. He's been dead. I just wanted to finish the fight my daddy started. So there. I'm the decider and I decided!" I mean seriously, Bin Laden is rotting away in a grave somewhere and politicians are still attempting to insult our intelligence by trying to maintain the facade of "terror".

Last edited by TnHilltopper; 09-05-2008 at 10:58 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 12:58 PM
 
4,173 posts, read 6,703,294 times
Reputation: 1216
LA Times is reporting that, despite protests in Pakistan, US is thnking of stepping up raids in Pakistan.
U.S. may step up raids in Pakistan - Los Angeles Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 12:59 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,255 posts, read 87,669,059 times
Reputation: 55570
catching bin laden would clench the GOP election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top