Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-03-2008, 12:36 AM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,623,751 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

The price tag of a loan to the Detroit automakers could top $34B: GM is asking for up to $18B, Ford wants $9B and Chrysler, $7B.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Automakers submitted their turnaround plans to Congress Tuesday with the hopes of winning approval for a lucrative loan package they claim is necessary for their survival.

Automakers turnaround plans sent to Congress - Dec. 2, 2008
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-03-2008, 12:43 AM
 
4,049 posts, read 5,034,404 times
Reputation: 1333
They'd better not get it, those bastards!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Where there is too much snow!
7,685 posts, read 13,149,938 times
Reputation: 4376
Let them fold, then we can all start buying a better vehicle like Toyota or Honda. Screw ford, gmc and chrysler.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Alaska & Florida
1,629 posts, read 5,385,104 times
Reputation: 837
Default Do you support the Auto Bailout, why?

I'm not sure if we should or not, but I just bought GM stock thinking a bailout will be passed next week and I'll be able to bank on that day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 01:25 PM
 
1,902 posts, read 2,469,790 times
Reputation: 543
No I don't for lots of reasons:

UAW
Management
Gubmint involvement

Just to name a few.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 01:41 PM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,592,578 times
Reputation: 2823
I don't. The business models and practices are the problem and they are not being changed. As a result, this money simply prolongs the same problem and will be wasted. They are asking for billions to get them through the next month or two. What happens then?

That's not the entire reason why I don't like it. I don't like the government being in this role.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 01:48 PM
 
Location: Turn Left at Greenland
17,764 posts, read 39,748,087 times
Reputation: 8253
There will be a bailout. However, it won't be the big 3 at this time next year. Some of the Chrysler brands will be merged into the other 2, specifically, Dodge.

I don't like the idea of bailing out executives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 01:51 PM
 
Location: Where there is too much snow!
7,685 posts, read 13,149,938 times
Reputation: 4376
Angry No Way!

No I don't, and it shouldn't be and Bailout, but a buyout.

They should let Toyota's and Honda's employees have a crack at buying up all of the big three stock and start all over with a new slate.

Oh, and throw the unions right out the door, along with anyone of the employees that even say the word (union). Start fresh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 01:53 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,209,709 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonotastic View Post
I'm not sure if we should or not, but I just bought GM stock thinking a bailout will be passed next week and I'll be able to bank on that day.


I am not even in favor of the bank bailouts. the federal goverment should have stayed out of it completely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
3,088 posts, read 5,358,553 times
Reputation: 1626
Yes, I do support "loans", not "bailout" for the auto industry, on the condition that NO UPPER MANAGEMENT gets any of that money, that it is all put to use to modernize, develop better and more fuel efficient vehicles, and to keep the workers employed, WITH adequate health insurance, retirement, etc. I have never worked in a union job, all the 401K money is in the tank, right now ( a whole bunch of it "dissapeared" after 9/11, and at 63, my body is starting to give out, but no retirement in sight for me. . . I don't want to see that happen to anyone else!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top