Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-04-2009, 05:49 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,350,215 times
Reputation: 8958

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
While many posters rejoice in Obama proposing caps on executive compensation and golden parachutes for companies getting government assistance (and I generally agree with the posters), another item received little notice:


The administration also will propose long-term compensation restrictions even for companies that don't receive government assistance, Obama said.

Those proposals include:

• Requiring top executives at financial institutions to hold stock for several years before they can cash out.

• A Treasury-sponsored conference on a long-term overhaul of executive compensation.

Obama caps executive pay tied to bailout money - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090204/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bailout_executive_pay - broken link)


I object to this proposal, companies not requesting government assistance shouldn't be restricted in setting compensation.
This is everything our founders were trying to guard against.

Ameircans: Rise up and oppose this tyrant before it's too late! Defeat the Democrat politiclal machine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-04-2009, 05:51 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,110,733 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
This is everything our founders were trying to guard against.
Oh, spares us the "Founders" canard, or explain to me Madison's understanding of mortgage backed security swaps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2009, 07:13 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,515,752 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Talent? Doctoral degrees?

We could learn quite a few things from Japanese companies.
I agree their Keynesian ideas were a total failure. We should learn from that....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2009, 08:39 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,110,733 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
I agree their Keynesian ideas were a total failure. We should learn from that....
I hope the emphasis is on "their".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2009, 08:42 PM
 
2,265 posts, read 3,737,965 times
Reputation: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
While many posters rejoice in Obama proposing caps on executive compensation and golden parachutes for companies getting government assistance (and I generally agree with the posters), another item received little notice:


The administration also will propose long-term compensation restrictions even for companies that don't receive government assistance, Obama said.

Those proposals include:

• Requiring top executives at financial institutions to hold stock for several years before they can cash out.

• A Treasury-sponsored conference on a long-term overhaul of executive compensation.


Obama caps executive pay tied to bailout money - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090204/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bailout_executive_pay - broken link)


I object to this proposal, companies not requesting government assistance shouldn't be restricted in setting compensation.
Obama change you can believe in! He's not a socialist he just wants to tell people how they can get paid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2009, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,257,517 times
Reputation: 7373
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeP View Post
Maybe if you were informed then you would that this proposal is directed towards those who are taking tax payer money.

It might help to get all of the facts before ranting.
Actually it isn't, the proposal is aimed at the companies not getting taxpayer money.

Please try to read and understand the article before you decide to lecture me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2009, 08:45 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,257,517 times
Reputation: 7373
Quote:
Originally Posted by paullySC View Post
Obama change you can believe in! He's not a socialist he just wants to tell people how they can get paid.
I'm just watching the cascade of proposals associated with this administration, and thinking about all of the posters who were stating that he isn't really a liberal at all, just a centrist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2009, 08:54 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,515,752 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
I'm just watching the cascade of proposals associated with this administration, and thinking about all of the posters who were stating that he isn't really a liberal at all, just a centrist.
Ive gone back and forth on that myself to be honest. During the election he was a bleeding heart. A week into the presidency he seemed more centrist. Then Pelosi took over.... Left once again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2009, 09:03 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,110,733 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
Actually it isn't, the proposal is aimed at the companies not getting taxpayer money.

Please try to read and understand the article before you decide to lecture me.
Ok, let's say that my reading skills just aren't up to par this evening, would you mind pointing out the area of the article, that I have read twice now, that points to non-TARP participants?

And thank you for your patience.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2009, 09:06 PM
 
27,625 posts, read 21,167,285 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
True. The bailouts seems to be like a loan from the mob. Accept it and they own you.
So, in your opinion, Wall Street was not acting like criminals? Why should struggling tax payers pay for the lifestyle that the fat cats have become accustomed to? These greedy pigs would have been very severely punished if they pulled this crap in another country. Screw them all, kick them to the curb and have very strict oversight on the new batch of bankers. If I understand your post correctly, you think that these modern day robber barons are the victims?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top