Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-19-2009, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Why should we who are responsible and live within our means bailout those who committed (well, not really) to a home they couldn't afford? Now, WE must foot the bill for these losers?

Video - CNBC.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-19-2009, 02:18 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,159,646 times
Reputation: 6195
Actually this mortgage assistance thing wont even cover 40% of people who were foreclosed within the time frame. So cheer up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
Who cares what the percentage is?

I bought a house I could afford, pay my mortgage on time, yet these irresponsible losers (who pretty much caused this meltdown) get to walk away with money in their pockets?

If they didn't pay before, why would they start paying now?

Obviously, you did not even take the time to listen to what he and his colleagues said.

Last edited by sanrene; 02-19-2009 at 03:10 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,706,970 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Who cares what the percentage is?

I bought a house I could afford, pay my mortgage on time, yet these irresponsible losers (who pretty muched caused this meltdown) get to walk away with money in their pockets?

If they didn't pay before, why would they start paying now?

Obviously, you did not even take the time to listen to what he and his colleagues said.
It sounds like you are lucky enough to live in an area where your house has retained its value as have the houses in your immediate neighborhood.

Much of the assistance is going towards helping people re-finance their existing mortgages - these are people who live in areas where their houses, through no fault of their own, have lost value and are now worth less than paid for. Most of these folks ARE paying their mortgages regularly and simply want to lock in the new low interest rates.
Should they be penalized because lenders don't want to part with their share of the TARP funds?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 02:37 PM
 
17,391 posts, read 16,532,427 times
Reputation: 29055
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Why should we who are responsible and live within our means bailout those who committed (well, not really) to a home they couldn't afford? Now, WE must foot the bill for these losers?

Video - CNBC.com
Same reason we're paying for Reid's vegas to CA train and saving Pelosi's mouse...

It's the Liberal way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 02:46 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,564,185 times
Reputation: 29289
Quote:
Originally Posted by springfieldva View Post
Same reason we're paying for Reid's vegas to CA train and saving Pelosi's mouse...

It's the Liberal way.
careful now, some idiot will show up jabbering 'obama won, get over it!!'

followed up with a picture of are putatively sour grapes.

as you noted, it's the liberal way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 03:13 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
It sounds like you are lucky enough to live in an area where your house has retained its value as have the houses in your immediate neighborhood.
No, I'm not and no it hasn't.

Quote:
Much of the assistance is going towards helping people re-finance their existing mortgages - these are people who live in areas where their houses, through no fault of their own, have lost value and are now worth less than paid for. Most of these folks ARE paying their mortgages regularly and simply want to lock in the new low interest rates.
Should they be penalized because lenders don't want to part with their share of the TARP funds?
Most of the assistance is going to people who could not afford the home they are in and should not have been able to obtain a mortgage with no money down, no credit and no job.

All those obama supporter making less than $40K a year who bought a $200K home.

And now they are entitled to get bailed out.

Why would we reward such poor, irresponsible behavior?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,706,970 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
No, I'm not and no it hasn't.



Most of the assistance is going to people who could not afford the home they are in and should not have been able to obtain a mortgage with no money down, no credit and no job.

All those obama supporter making less than $40K a year who bought a $200K home.

And now they are entitled to get bailed out.

Why would we reward such poor, irresponsible behavior?
"Obama continued, assuring his audience “… it will not help speculators who took risky bets on a rising market and bought homes not to live in but to sell. It will not help dishonest lenders who acted irresponsibility, distorting the facts and dismissing the fine print at the expense of buyers who didn’t know better. And it will not reward folks who bought homes they knew from the beginning they would never be able to afford.”"

Washington Wire - WSJ.com : Obama: Mortgage Plan ‘Will Not Help Speculators’
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 03:38 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
Right. Sure.

How are they going to pick and choose who gets help and who doesn't?

Case by case? I have a bridge to sell you if you believe that.

Quote:
It will not help dishonest lenders who acted irresponsibility
In case you haven't noticed with the first bank bailout funds, we already have.

So much for what obama says. Unfortunately, he has the media testicles in his lockbox and they would not dare to question that statement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 04:01 PM
 
Location: here
24,873 posts, read 36,176,449 times
Reputation: 32726
I, too, have a problem with this, as someone who has only ever had 30 year fixed mortgages, and has never missed a payment. However, if more people can stay in their homes, values will say higher, and that is good for every homeowner, including me. So, would you cut off your nose to spite your face?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top