Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-01-2009, 06:47 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

For very good reasons.

National Review Institute | About us

Quote:
Dear Attorney General Holder:

This letter is respectfully submitted to inform you that I must decline the invitation to participate in the May 4 roundtable meeting the President’s Task Force on Detention Policy is convening with current and former prosecutors involved in international terrorism cases. An invitation was extended to me by trial lawyers from the Counterterrorism Section, who are members of the Task Force, which you are leading.
Quote:
Moreover, in light of public statements by both you and the President, it is dismayingly clear that, under your leadership, the Justice Department takes the position that a lawyer who in good faith offers legal advice to government policy makers—like the government lawyers who offered good faith advice on interrogation policy—may be subject to investigation and prosecution for the content of that advice, in addition to empty but professionally damaging accusations of ethical misconduct. Given that stance, any prudent lawyer would have to hesitate before offering advice to the government...
Quote:
I am, in addition, powerless to stop the President, as he takes these reckless steps, from touting his Detention Policy Task Force as a demonstration of his national security seriousness. But I can decline to participate in the charade.
Good for this guy, and hopefully more of those obama is seeking advice from will also B****-slap him. Great letter.

Last edited by sanrene; 05-01-2009 at 07:11 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-01-2009, 07:10 PM
 
654 posts, read 466,558 times
Reputation: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by From the article
I am similarly powerless to stop the administration from admitting into the United States such alien jihadists as the 17 remaining Uighur detainees.
The Uighers have been held in Gitmo for seven years without any charges being brought against them.

Whether we admit them into the US is another story, but it is simply unjust to arbitrarily imprison people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 07:12 PM
 
1,655 posts, read 3,248,191 times
Reputation: 508
What a fool. Any lawyer who thinks those memos were written in good faith are terrible at their jobs. I'm glad he refused the invite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118
I know, they're completely harmless.

Must have took a left turn and somehow ended up in an AQ training camp.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 07:14 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
What a fool. Any lawyer who thinks those memos were written in good faith are terrible at their jobs.
You cannot prosecute somebody for giving you their best legal opinion - one that has been deliberated, researched and corroborated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 07:16 PM
 
1,655 posts, read 3,248,191 times
Reputation: 508
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
You cannot prosecute somebody for giving you their best legal opinion - one that has been deliberated, researched and corroborated.
Of course you can... when it has not been deliberated, researched or corroborated. They may not be prosecuted but hopefully they will be disbarred. Do you need a law degree to know that it would be illegal for the President to order the testicles of a child to be crushed in order to get information from a detainee? That's what these so-called lawyers argued.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 07:19 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 10,281,581 times
Reputation: 1893
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
You cannot prosecute somebody for giving you their best legal opinion - one that has been deliberated, researched and corroborated.
You have no understanding of law whatsoever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 07:19 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Of course you can... when it has not been deliberated, researched or corroborated. They may not be prosecuted but hopefully they will be disbarred. Do you need a law degree to know that it would be illegal for the President to order the testicles of a child to be crushed in order to get information from a detainee? That's what these so-called lawyers argued.
It is clear, the lawyers advising pres. bush did deliberate, research and came to a consensus.

Please provide a link to this argument about crushing testicles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
You have no understanding of law whatsoever.
As in the case of the lawyers advising the president, it is a legal opinion. Just as yours is an opinion with no basis in fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 07:32 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,984,135 times
Reputation: 4555
Look what happens when Obama extends a hand to the right wing columnist Andrew McCarthy. He insults Obama then the wingnuts post the insult on forums as a smear against Obama....LOL

Do you see now why it is foolish to give respect to those who wish you ill?


Here is the "security analyst" who declined to come to the table and be heard.

"Andrew McCarthy a conservative opinion columnist who writes for National Review and Commentary. He has defended the practice of waterboarding as not necessarily being torture in some situations to prosecute the War on Terror[2][3] whilst admitting that "waterboarding is close enough to torture that reasonable minds can differ on whether it is torture".[4]

McCarthy also thought it was a great idea to prosecute the Iraq War. He was one of the War's biggest cheerleaders....How's that for good advise!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top