Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-07-2009, 03:49 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,788,452 times
Reputation: 4174

Advertisements

Looks like Al Gore's usual magic is still working. The silly global-warming fanatic has had lecture after lecture cancelled due to heavy snow, unseasonably cold temperatures, etc., until he finally changed the name of his supposed concern to "global climate change" instead.

Gore had nothing to do with the "carbon neutral" expedition that set out for Greenland this spring, but they seem to have suffered a similar fate to his many failed lecture attempts. During their attempt to display just how viable their "green" technology was, their boat was lashed by severe storms, capsizing three times as their carbon-neutral equipment was systematically destroyed by wind and wave.

The crowning insult came as they were rescued - by a supertanker carrying two-thirds of a million barrels of crude oil.

Well, they did accomplish one of their goals: They conclusively proved just how viable their "green" equipment was in a real-world test.

------------------------------------

Oil tanker rescues green activists from stormy seas | Environment | The Guardian

When is a green activist glad to see 680,000 barrels of oil?

Robert Booth
The Guardian, Wednesday 6 May 2009

It was meant to be a carbon-neutral adventure to fire the imaginations of 25,000 schoolchildren.

Raoul Surcouf, 40, a landscape gardener from Jersey, and Richard Spink, 32, a physiotherapist from Bristol, shunned the polluting aircraft normally used to reach Greenland's polar ice cap and set sail in Fleur, a 40ft yacht fitted with solar panels and a wind turbine. Schools were poised to follow their green expedition online; once the duo had skied across the Arctic wastes they had hoped to boast of the first carbon-neutral crossing of Greenland.

On Friday, nature, displaying a heavy irony, intervened. After a battering by hurricane force winds, the crew of the Carbon Neutral Expeditions craft had to be rescued 400 miles off Ireland.

As if their ordeal wasn't terrifying enough, their saviour seemed chosen to rub salt in their wounds: a 113,000-ton tanker, Overseas Yellowstone, carrying 680,000 barrels of crude.

In truth, the crew could not afford to be choosy. They were in a life-threatening predicament, and heaped thanks on Captain Ferro, the tanker's skipper, and his crew for being "outstanding in the execution of the rescue". But the rather awkward twist was not lost on Spink, who ruefully noted afterwards that "the team are now safely and ironically aboard the oil tanker" as they headed to Maine, where they are due to arrive in three days.

"They are extremely relieved to just be alive," said Jess Tombs, a spokeswoman for the expedition. Were they feeling sheepish about being rescued by an oil tanker? "They were just relieved," she said. "We don't want to think about what the outcome would have been if they hadn't."


(Full text of the article can be read at the above URL)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-07-2009, 03:52 PM
 
Location: The D-M-V area
13,691 posts, read 18,460,842 times
Reputation: 9596
Ha! How Ironic!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 05:50 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,507,138 times
Reputation: 11351
Reminds me of the anti-whaling terrorists getting rescued by a Japanese whaling ship once. LOL

But seriously, "green" technology could be used at sea effectively, they simply did a poor job of it. Wind power can be harnessed...use a wood or charcoal burning steam engine for back up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 05:58 PM
 
Location: Virginia
654 posts, read 1,211,149 times
Reputation: 345
Any bets on how long it takes for a ******* to come on here and claim that the winds that capsized their boat are a result of man made globull warming, or climate change, or whatever the term is this week?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 08:11 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,788,452 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
use a wood or charcoal burning steam engine for back up.
(wondering if AHS actually considers a backup wood- or coal-burning engine is somehow LESS polluting than a backup gasoline or diesel engine)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top