Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-27-2009, 02:08 PM
 
4,459 posts, read 4,210,845 times
Reputation: 648

Advertisements

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich posted on his Twitter feed today a call for Judge Sonia Sotomayor to withdraw her nomination because she is a “Latina woman racist.” As evidence of her supposed racism, Gingrich posted an out-of-context quote from a lecture that Sotomayor gave in 2001 on diversity. Gingrich wrote, “new racism is no better than old racism” and added:

As Greg Sargent notes, Gingrich’s demand that Sotomayor withdraw was later retweeted — which is “generally taken as a sign of agreement” — by the RNC’s new media director, Todd Herman. When asked about Gingrich’s comment during today’s White House press conference, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs responded by noting that “the blog of a former lawmaker” is hardly the best source of objective information on Sotomayor:
GIBBS: I think it is probably important for any involved in this debate to be exceedingly careful with the way in which they’ve decided to describe different aspects of the impending confirmation. I think we’re satisfied that when the people of America and the people of the Senate get a chance to look at more than just the blog of a former lawmaker that they’ll come to the same conclusion that the President did.


Think Progress » Gingrich Calls On Sotomayor To Withdraw Because She’s A ‘Latina Woman Racist’

I do love this... I hope "The Newt" keeps opening his pie hole, it just helps our success...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-27-2009, 02:09 PM
 
2,095 posts, read 2,582,287 times
Reputation: 1268
agreed. we don't need racists or identity politics on the supreme court
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 02:12 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
4,897 posts, read 8,320,466 times
Reputation: 1911
Let's face it, they're going to lie, lie, lie about her just like they would lie, lie, lie about anyone else who was nominated. Obama could have nominated Jesus himself and the Republicans would bad mouth him saying he hangs around with prostitutes, assaults money changers, and has a huge ego (thinks he's the son of god). There is literally no candidate those hacks wouldn't attack & slander from the get go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 02:13 PM
 
6,762 posts, read 11,632,440 times
Reputation: 3028
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dukester View Post
Gingrich posted an out-of-context quote from a lecture

Since when do liberals give a flying **** about context???? Their biggest weapons against the Republicans are using out of context quotes and a complicit media to repeat the lies that they attach to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 02:16 PM
 
4,459 posts, read 4,210,845 times
Reputation: 648
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXboomerang View Post
Since when do liberals give a flying **** about context???? Their biggest weapons against the Republicans are using out of context quotes and a complicit media to repeat the lies that they attach to them.
You neoCONS are the master of spin... Just ask FAUX News...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
9,059 posts, read 12,974,155 times
Reputation: 1401
She's all three.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Southeast
4,301 posts, read 7,035,466 times
Reputation: 1464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerdin View Post
Let's face it, they're going to lie, lie, lie about her just like they would lie, lie, lie about anyone else who was nominated. Obama could have nominated Jesus himself and the Republicans would bad mouth him saying he hangs around with prostitutes, assaults money changers, and has a huge ego (thinks he's the son of god). There is literally no candidate those hacks wouldn't attack & slander from the get go.
You mean just the Democrats did and would do to every Republican choice..?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 02:28 PM
 
Location: The Wine Country, CA
807 posts, read 1,303,275 times
Reputation: 304
Sounds like Gingrich and Limbaugh are out in full force and ready to battle to discredit Sotomayer..

With that said, I do find these identity politics to be disturbing..

I am witholding my judgement until I see her voting record..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 02:30 PM
 
8,185 posts, read 12,641,953 times
Reputation: 2893
Either she is a racist or she is a poor public speaker.
Nonetheless Gingrich is correct about one thing - new racism and old racism are both bad and nothing to gloss over. Whether Sotomayor is a racist, well I don't know and likely noone else on this forum can 'know' either. We can hope for the best and in the meantime look at some of her past rulings to give us a clue as to the way her mind works.

Oh, and lets not pretend that democrats haven't raked over the coals every republican nominee for the supreme court as well --- it is how the partisan game is played, and apparently selective amnesia plays a part in it as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,337,514 times
Reputation: 15291
Oh, there's room for a Latina racist on the court. That's a profoudly under-represented group.

After all, the Court has had its share of male, Anglo racists.

It's balkan payback time. More and more, that's what America is all about.

Personally, I just wish Sotomayor looked a little less like Roseanne Barr.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top