Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should Supreme Court Justices be elected directly by the voters..?
YES 13 15.48%
NO 71 84.52%
Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-11-2010, 07:43 AM
 
Location: between Ath,GR & Mia,FL...
2,574 posts, read 2,489,970 times
Reputation: 327

Advertisements

On the eve of a SCJ nomination,the subject comes up...

Should SCJ be appointed by the Pres & approved by the Senate or should the voters elect them by voting..?

I believe in democracy. All persons of real power should be elected DIRECTLY by the people,not chosen indirectly,by already elected politicians...

It is better politics...It is a better system...

What do u think ..?

Remember to vote in the poll too...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-11-2010, 07:50 AM
 
Location: between Ath,GR & Mia,FL...
2,574 posts, read 2,489,970 times
Reputation: 327
I voted YES with both hands...
SCJ have even higher power that the President himself...
With a 5-4 vote they can nullify laws of the Congress ,supported by the President...

It is completely stupid to fight...tooth & nail for elections of politicians & accept a non democratic process for politicians higher in power than the President,Senators,Reps,Governors & state legislators...

So,YES,by all means...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2010, 07:53 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,285,332 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by harrymiafl View Post
I voted YES with both hands...
SCJ have even higher power that the President himself...
With a 5-4 vote they can nullify laws of the Congress ,supported by the President...

It is completely stupid to fight...tooth & nail for elections of politicians & accept a non democratic process for politicians higher in power than the President,Senators,Reps,Governors & state legislators...

So,YES,by all means...
MY GOD, NO. We elect the other two branches of our government and look at the mess we have with that system, today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2010, 07:54 AM
 
Location: Vermont
11,761 posts, read 14,661,252 times
Reputation: 18534
Absolutely not. Ever since Marbury v. Madison one of the central functions of the Supreme Court has been to evaluate whether the actions of the legislative and executive branches have been taken in conformity with the law. If we were faced with a situation in which candidates for the Supreme Court had to campaign for votes, presumably with the support of political parties, we could forget any pretense that the Court would be making its decisions on the basis of the law, rather than the political views of the justices and the people that elected them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2010, 07:54 AM
 
4,604 posts, read 8,234,548 times
Reputation: 1266
If you're looking for democracy then maybe you should move to Greece. Take cash.

The U.S. is a constitutional republic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2010, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,863,405 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by harrymiafl View Post
I voted YES with both hands...
SCJ have even higher power that the President himself...
With a 5-4 vote they can nullify laws of the Congress ,supported by the President...

It is completely stupid to fight...tooth & nail for elections of politicians & accept a non democratic process for politicians higher in power than the President,Senators,Reps,Governors & state legislators...

So,YES,by all means...
Are you completely out of your mind? The public can barely muster enough knowledge to select their city councilmen, how could they make an informed decision on a SC candidate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2010, 07:56 AM
 
Location: North Las Vegas
1,125 posts, read 1,591,595 times
Reputation: 929
Quote:
Originally Posted by harrymiafl View Post
On the eve of a SCJ nomination,the subject comes up...

Should SCJ be appointed by the Pres & approved by the Senate or should the voters elect them by voting..?

I believe in democracy. All persons of real power should be elected DIRECTLY by the people,not chosen indirectly,by already elected politicians...

It is better politics...It is a better system...

What do u think ..?

Remember to vote in the poll too...
All of these feelings of yours would be appropriate if we actually lived in a democracy. But since we live in a constitution-based federal republic then voting for a Supreme Court Justice would go against the law of the land. Therefore I voted no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2010, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Neither here nor there
14,810 posts, read 16,212,851 times
Reputation: 33001
I voted no because the electorate-at-large is too ill-informed, too easily swayed and too fickle to make an important decision like that. However, I would entertain the idea of a 10 or 12 year term for SC justices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2010, 08:00 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,317,854 times
Reputation: 7364
Yes, we'd all love to have Justin Timberline or Pamela Anderson as Supreme Court justices. Ordinary people off the street don't have the expertise to know if a person is truly qualified to be a justice or not. It's a lifetime job, we can't afford to let popularity win the high court.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2010, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,227,792 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by harrymiafl View Post
On the eve of a SCJ nomination,the subject comes up...

Should SCJ be appointed by the Pres & approved by the Senate or should the voters elect them by voting..?

I believe in democracy. All persons of real power should be elected DIRECTLY by the people,not chosen indirectly,by already elected politicians...

It is better politics...It is a better system...

What do u think ..?

Remember to vote in the poll too...
destroy the constitution, no thanks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top