Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You know, this would be a good argument against car ownership. Forget the good that comes from driving, at least it would prevent the few deaths that occur from them.
How often is a car used to purposely kill someone?
Not really sure where the semantics argument is going here...ok, I'll amend my other post to say "vehicular murder", thus implying intent, if that suits ya.
Not really sure where the semantics argument is going here...ok, I'll amend my other post to say "vehicular murder", thus implying intent, if that suits ya.
Vehicular homicide includes drunk driving statistics. Drunk drivers are idiots, but they're not intentionally killing people. That's my point.
"Vehicular homicide includes drunk driving statistics. Drunk drivers are idiots, but they're not intentionally killing people. That's my point."
Whoa, be very careful when you compare drunk drivers to people who kill another with a gun. A vehicle is a powerful tool, like a gun, and combining alcohol with operating that powerful tool is just as bad as taking out a gun and shooting someone! Probably better not cross into this territory here...my question is, then, would you feel that a drunken driver who just killed a family should be held less accountable than a man who killed a convenience store clerk in a robbery? Why or why not? (This is a genuine question).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.