Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's not the point being made, stay focused here. The point is that all the liberals were pumping their fists and cheering for this woman when she was protesting Bush, now they want her to go away becasue they are annoying their messiah.
Actually, no. I thought she was annoying even back then.
that made no sense whatsoever. Are you even fluent in the English language? What country are you posting from? Really, I'd like to know. You are really hard to understand what you are saying sometimes.
I thought the same thing while trying to read that post.
Actually, no. I thought she was annoying even back then.
she is annoying but I have to say her premise is right. The troops should be brought home now. We are not leaving in defeat if we left now as some would have us believe.
This means nothing. The government didn't do this, the people who own those airwaves did it unlike what NBC and MSNBC is doing today, since they ARE IN BED WITH THE WH!
Last edited by Marka; 09-01-2009 at 07:54 AM..
Reason: cut quote
This means nothing. The government didn't do this, the people who own those airwaves did it unlike what NBC and MSNBC is doing today, since they ARE IN BED WITH THE WH!
Do you think they're having sex? I hope they use protection. Can you even have sex w/an organization? What about sharing the same bed?
I am a liberal and I support her protest. We should arrange a military withdrawal (covering our collective asses while leaving) from both Iraq and Afghanistan right now. I would like to add a provision that any women and children could come with us as refugees from deadly oppression. The result should be a complete internal conflagration that will leave both countries vulnerable to invasion from their “oh so loving” neighbors.
I'm not sure i've ever seen a more contradictory statement in all my born days.
1) You support her protest
2) You support a total withdrawl
3) You support refugees
4) You support an invasion by the, quote, "oh so loving" neighbors
In other words, you condone invading other countries, but you don't support the work of the United States, whose intentions are arguably much more noble than any of those other "loving countries" you like to support.
This means nothing. The government didn't do this, the people who own those airwaves did it unlike what NBC and MSNBC is doing today, since they ARE IN BED WITH THE WH!
Quote:
Originally Posted by karfar
Do you think they're having sex? I hope they use protection. Can you even have sex w/an organization? What about sharing the same bed?
In this instance, I give my full support to abortion. Any organizational offspring supporting this White House needs exterminating. Double-standards such as the one mentioned in the OP are beyond unbelievable.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
