Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-31-2009, 11:45 AM
 
7,359 posts, read 10,279,481 times
Reputation: 1893

Advertisements

Cellphones Cause Brain Tumors, Says New Report By International EMF Collaborative

Good thing I avoid the phone like the plague.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-31-2009, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,861 posts, read 24,115,793 times
Reputation: 15135
Does this mean that all the folks who justify their calling for outright bans on cigarettes with "2nd hand smoke" health concerns are going to start calling for bans on cellphones - after all, there are now "2nd hand radiation" concerns...

This should be interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 12:11 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,207,220 times
Reputation: 5481
Just use a headset...problem solved...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 12:42 PM
 
Location: mancos
7,787 posts, read 8,030,764 times
Reputation: 6691
i can see the 2000% tax on cell phones coming now. of course it will be used for childrens healthcare
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 12:48 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,159,646 times
Reputation: 6195
"Telecom funded studies underestimate the risk of brain tumors;
***
This report, sent to government leaders and media today, details eleven design flaws of the 13-country, Telecom-funded Interphone study. The Interphone study, begun in 1999, was intended to determine the risks of brain tumors, but its full publication has been held up for years. Components of this study published to date reveal what the authors call a 'systemic-skew', greatly underestimating brain tumor risk."

"That's all right boys, let's just keep up the pressure for damage caps and we'll be fine."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 12:57 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,324,078 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by hnsq View Post
Just use a headset...problem solved...
Yeah, just put the unit in you pocket and blow your balls off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
7,085 posts, read 12,057,017 times
Reputation: 4125
There is something wrong with this report, I cannot see how it is truthful.

Referenced report, substantiation of fact by

Study Elizabeth Cardis. Cellphones and Cancer, Session 2-3, Bioelectromagnetics Society Meeting, Maui, Hawaii. June 2003, Slide 22.
- She did not attend this meeting (Presentations - 2003) and the results of the study were never delayed and they did not say it caused cancer ("We believe that such a global conclusion is premature and not supported by the data." - Re: Cellular Telephone Use and Cancer Risk: Update of a Nationwide Danish Cohort Study -- Ahlbom et al. 99 (8): 655 -- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute)

- Christensen, et al., Cellular telephones and risk for brain tumors - actually stated the opposite conclusion that was linked in the paper: "The results do not support an association between use of cellular telephones and risk for glioma or meningioma (http://www.neurology.org/cgi/content/abstract/64/7/1189)"

Just those two alone are dead wrong in the assertions of the paper, I don't have more time for research, but this is just a sham.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 01:09 PM
 
1,712 posts, read 3,103,971 times
Reputation: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by subsound View Post
There is something wrong with this report, I cannot see how it is truthful.

Referenced report, substantiation of fact by

Study Elizabeth Cardis. Cellphones and Cancer, Session 2-3, Bioelectromagnetics Society Meeting, Maui, Hawaii. June 2003, Slide 22.
- She did not attend this meeting (Presentations - 2003) and the results of the study were never delayed and they did not say it caused cancer ("We believe that such a global conclusion is premature and not supported by the data." - Re: Cellular Telephone Use and Cancer Risk: Update of a Nationwide Danish Cohort Study -- Ahlbom et al. 99 (8): 655 -- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute)

- Christensen, et al., Cellular telephones and risk for brain tumors - actually stated the opposite conclusion that was linked in the paper: "The results do not support an association between use of cellular telephones and risk for glioma or meningioma (http://www.neurology.org/cgi/content/abstract/64/7/1189)"

Just those two alone are dead wrong in the assertions of the paper, I don't have more time for research, but this is just a sham.
Are you a researcher on this topic?

Please show us evidence that refutes the study on cell phones (if there is some)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 01:19 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
7,085 posts, read 12,057,017 times
Reputation: 4125
Quote:
Originally Posted by machiavelli1 View Post
Are you a researcher on this topic?

Please show us evidence that refutes the study on cell phones (if there is some)
I'm not refuting the studies, but I am challenging the sources they reference to prove their point in the paper the article is presenting. 2 studies right off the bat where they state the opposite conclusion in the paper then the studies actually came up with is a serious credibility issue.

The studies themselves I referenced state there is little impact between cancer and cell phones, the very studies they link and lied to state that cell phones do cause cancer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 01:25 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,324,078 times
Reputation: 2337
Here's a secret study.


Secret Report On Cell Phone Dangers And Tetra Confidential Report On TETRA Strictly For The Police Federation Of England and Wales
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top