Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-16-2009, 12:16 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,787,000 times
Reputation: 4174

Advertisements

The Obama administration has announced new, higher gas mileage standards for cars in the U.S. These will have the effect of forcing car companies to produce even smaller cars, among other things.

Repeated studies have shown that smaller cars have higher injury and fatality rates in collisions, than larger cars. The Obama administration, and the Democrat congress that passed the basic rules over Republican objections, seems to feel these additional deaths are an acceptable price to pay, to get better gas mileage and save oil.

They are also mandating levels of CO2 and other greenhouse gases. This despite the fact that, even after 30+ years of research and probes, no one has ever found any actual evidence that man's activities have had any effect on global warming/cooling at all.

SSDD for the leftist extremists in the Obama administration.

--------------------------------------

Fuel-economy rules set 35.5 mpg standard for 2016 models - USATODAY.com

Fuel-economy rules set 35.5 mpg standard for 2016 models

by James R. Healey, USA TODAY

The government announced tough new fuel-economy standards Tuesday in a proposed rule that also would place the first nationwide limits on vehicles' greenhouse gas emissions, blamed for global warming. The Obama administration outlined its targets in May, but final details were uncertain until the joint announcement by the federal Department of Transportation and Environmental Protection Agency.


(Full text of the article can be read at the above URL)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-16-2009, 12:30 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,068,169 times
Reputation: 17865
Doesn't state it but that can't be for trucks too?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2009, 12:35 PM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,987,336 times
Reputation: 3396
Complete nonsense!

Getting car companies to commit to manufacturing higher MPG cars is a way to get more people to drive sensibly sized cars like Honda Accords, and less to drive gas guzzling SUVs like Hummers and Ford Expeditions.

It will also push American car manufacturers to improve gas technology, which has hardly moved in the past 50 years. Cars were getting 20 mpg back in the 1970's.

It's great that we now have a president who isn't "in bed" with the oil companies!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2009, 12:37 PM
 
5,391 posts, read 7,232,198 times
Reputation: 2857
Good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2009, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Chicago Suburbs
3,199 posts, read 4,318,057 times
Reputation: 1176
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
Complete nonsense!

Getting car companies to commit to manufacturing higher MPG cars is a way to get more people to drive sensibly sized cars like Honda Accords, and less to drive gas guzzling SUVs like Hummers and Ford Expeditions.

It will also push American car manufacturers to improve gas technology, which has hardly moved in the past 50 years. Cars were getting 20 mpg back in the 1970's.
Nonsense is right.
Manufacturers have made great advancements in order to meet federally mandated agendas which are at odds with overall effeciency i.e. safety/ emission standards vs. economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2009, 12:48 PM
 
Location: Arizona High Desert
4,792 posts, read 5,903,410 times
Reputation: 3103
Saves on parking spaces, too. Smaller garages. I remember when gasoline was 25 cents a gallon. I have noticed that "worried pinched look" on the faces of people pumping gas into their monster trucks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2009, 12:53 PM
 
Location: Chicago Suburbs
3,199 posts, read 4,318,057 times
Reputation: 1176
Cracks me up how "liberals" are so offended with the choices others make and will say darn near anything to justify theirs.

Whats next, a mandate for smaller cars because they are "cuter"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2009, 12:53 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,799,372 times
Reputation: 24863
We could save a huge amount of fuel and have safer highways if we put all the interstate cargo on railroads and eliminated big trucks on the highways.

I have had small cars for years and use the maneuverability to drive around crashes that I would not have missed in a big tub.

Maybe we should apply fuel mileage standards to big trucks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2009, 12:54 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,787,000 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by allydriver View Post
Manufacturers have made great advancements in order to meet federally mandated agendas which are at odds with overall effeciency i.e. safety/ emission standards vs. economy.
And yet even recent studies show that when small cars collide with each other, more deaths and injuries result than when big cars collide with each other.

And when a small car collides with a big car, of course the discrepancy is even worse.

How many Americans will pay with their lives, for the policies of the Obama administration?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2009, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
2,616 posts, read 2,399,335 times
Reputation: 2416
Now I get, Obama plans to get those old folks killed by making them drive small cars instead of using the death panels. That makes sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:00 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top