Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Fox news and Fox...different animals. Federal premium ammunition co. and Federal Express: same company? BTW, you would've also caught the sex trade scandal by watching Fox.
Fox and Fox news are the same company. Duh. What a retarded comment.
News Corporation is owned by Rupert Murdoch, who owns both companies under the same conglomerate. Wow.
I really don't understand the contempt for spelling and grammar on this board but ok. I wonder what reasons they had for voting in favor of Acorn; maybe the question wasn't clear and they didn't understand it Those double negatives can be a doozy.
Oh and Obama wasn't a former Acorn attorney; he was a lawyer with a private practice and he represented Acorn in a lawsuit.
look at who Acorn suppoorted and you will see its the usual thing.The lack of coverage from some networks until they had to says alot too.Obama said he really was up on it but of cousre knew about West and the police/professor incidents ;so he looks bad when asked if it shoudl be further investigated.
American Idol and the Family Guy shows? Yeah, you may have a point if I toss in King of The Hill.
The FOX news networks... I didn't think it was such a far leap to make from the list of news networks you listed ! And it's people like you that vote in this country ! WOW...
I really don't understand the contempt for spelling and grammar on this board but ok. I wonder what reasons they had for voting in favor of Acorn; maybe the question wasn't clear and they didn't understand it Those double negatives can be a doozy.
Oh and Obama wasn't a former Acorn attorney; he was a lawyer with a private practice and he represented Acorn in a lawsuit.
Come on, Nat, you talk about spelling and grammar and then you get into a purely semantical offering about being a lawyer and representing in a court case, or two. To me a lawyer representing someone is their lawyer. Just because he did it as a member of a law firm doesn't free him of being that group's lawyer, to me. The fact that he served them as an authority and teacher on the subject of community organizing tells me that serving as their lawyer may have been connected.
Now, in all seriousness, I do believe that he may have sunk some ships from his past when he said that they need to be investigated, yesterday. Surely he said that from wanting to appear to be something.
Come on, Nat, you talk about spelling and grammar and then you get into a purely semantical offering about being a lawyer and representing in a court case, or two. To me a lawyer representing someone is their lawyer. Just because he did it as a member of a law firm doesn't free him of being that group's lawyer, to me. The fact that he served them as an authority and teacher on the subject of community organizing tells me that serving as their lawyer may have been connected.
Now, in all seriousness, I do believe that he may have sunk some ships from his past when he said that they need to be investigated, yesterday. Surely he said that from wanting to appear to be something.
I really wasn't trying to turn this into English 101 but it gets annoying trying to figure out what people are trying to say when they type a bunch of run on sentences and fragmens wheel mispelling ever other word so then I have to go back and try to fill in the missing peaces rearrange the letters like a word jumble in the funny pages and by that time I've lost interest in whatever they have to say.
As for the lawyer bit, I guess it's just the wording of it. In my mind it should have said "Obama, who represented Acorn in a lawsuit..." but that's just me.
Here are 75 Democrats who voted against stopping all federal funding to Acorn.
These 75 idiots should be in flashing lights as they just committed themselves to being for a group of fraudsters who use our tax money to screw us back.
We cannot allow these 75 to remain unknown, they all should be called out on the carpet and be demanded to tell us why they still want out tax money going to this fraudulent group.
Baldwin
Becerra
Brady (PA)
Brown, Corrine
Butterfield
Capuano
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Cleaver
Clyburn
Crowley
Cummings
Davis (IL)
DeGette
Delahunt
Doyle
Edwards (MD)
Ellison
Engel
Fattah
Filner
Fudge
Green, Al
Grijalva
Hinchey
Hirono
Holt
Honda
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Johnson, E. B.
Kilpatrick (MI)
Kucinich
Larsen (WA)
Lee (CA)
Lewis (GA)
Lynch
Markey (MA)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
Meeks (NY)
Mollohan
Moore (WI)
Moran (VA)
Nadler (NY)
Neal (MA)
Olver
Pallone
Pascrell
Payne
Polis (CO)
Price (NC)
Rahall
Rangel
Roybal-Allard
Rush
Sánchez, Linda T.
Schakowsky
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Sherman
Sires
Slaughter
Stark
Thompson (MS)
Towns
Tsongas
Velázquez
Waters
Watson
Waxman
Wexler
Woolsey
Just so you will know ALL republicans voted to stop my tax dollar from going to Acorn.
Thanks for posting this...all who voted in favor should be checked into their connections with Acorn!
I agree.
I do not see any of the left wingers posting about how and why the 75 liberal idiots voted this way.
Usually they come up with excuses or reason to defend their constant wrongful decisions.
Lets keep this info ( the list ) alive and moving so these 75 LOSE THEIR JOBS.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.