Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-25-2009, 06:00 PM
 
Location: Alvarado, TX
2,917 posts, read 4,767,269 times
Reputation: 802

Advertisements

Quote:
As the Obama administration wrestles with how to deal with the worsening military and political situation in Afghanistan and the worsening level of public support for the war at home, new details are emerging about how the president is thinking about his decision on whether to send more U.S. troops to the region.

According to Howard "Buck" McKeon, R-CA, the new top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, Obama told Central Command head Gen. David Petraeus and Afghanistan commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal to "scrub" their assessments because he "wasn't inclined to send troops over there."

If McKeon's claim is true, Obama's instructions, relayed to McKeon through Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, show how resistant the president is to doubling down on the war in Afghanistan and how Republicans are prepared to take their push for an increased commitment of resources to the public.
I doubt hardly anything, anymore.

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/po...ub_assessments
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-25-2009, 06:07 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
lol..make the report look good because I don't want to deal with it ?

HA HA HA.

Won't amount to much. The press sect'y says in that article that they never meant it that way because Obama is still undecided on the issue.

See..total miscommunication and mis-understanding by the military. It's "he said, she said" so it's meaningless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2009, 08:53 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,867,563 times
Reputation: 18304
I really doubt that because of the statements sent by both military men backed by the joint chiefs. He has to do something. They basically told him to send enough troops or get out ;as it will be wasting lifes.Those are strong statemnts that put him on the spot really.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2009, 09:09 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Didn't some military guy do the same to Bush ? Then after that didn't he conveniently retire or something and someone more in line with Bush's thinking took his place ?

Pays to have some "yes" men in place before you ask jaded questions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top