Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on this issue of the energy tax because we need to fight back. Thomas Jefferson told us, having a revolution every now and then is a good thing, and the people — we the people — are going to have to fight back hard if we’re not going to lose our country. And I think this has the potential of changing the dynamic of freedom forever in the United States."
what does crap & tax have to do with the census, sickie?
She should have been "hammered" by her own party each time she made another of these neocon anti-American rabble rousing violence inducing statements....where WERE they????
Name ONE violence inducing statement that she's made. And here's a towel to wipe the foam from your mouth.....
"I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on this issue of the energy tax because we need to fight back. Thomas Jefferson told us, having a revolution every now and then is a good thing, and the people — we the people — are going to have to fight back hard if we’re not going to lose our country. And I think this has the potential of changing the dynamic of freedom forever in the United States."
For a member of Congress to urge armed resistance against lawful actions of the US government crosses the line. Her speech is sedition, and (according to section 2383 of title 18 of the US Code), she is not only subject to being locked up for ten years, but she is “incapable of holding any office under the United States.â€
Where do you get "armed resistance" out of this? Fighting back can take many forms, from contacting your representative to voting the bums out. And the actions of the US government regarding the census pertain to only counting heads, not the questionnaire that she was referring to. The US government is crossing the line in asking all those questions on the census.
I disagree, she is a public figure, responsible for the blabber that comes out of her mouth.
Yes, she's responsible for what she says, and for any consequences. But as of yet, we have nothing to go on to say that this census worker's death was a consequence of Bachmann's rhetoric.
what does crap & tax have to do with the census, sickie?
I took for granted that anyone with any sense would understand that I was pointing out Bachmann's fear mongering type of rhetoric. This is about Bachmann's inciting violence. Why didn't you get that? That's right, that would entail some critical thinking skills.
I took for granted that anyone with any sense would understand that I was pointing out Bachmann's fear mongering type of rhetoric. This is about Bachmann's inciting violence. Why didn't you get that? That's right, that would entail some critical thinking skills.
I would think that critical thinking skills would also demand that there be some sort of link between Bachmann's rhetoric and this man's killers. Oops, we don't know who the killers were, we don't know why they murdered this man. Therefore, in a critical analysis, we don't have any way of knowing if Bachmann's rhetoric was connected in any way to this man's death.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.