Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Finally someone is writting about something that has been out there for a while. It seems the Authority on AGW who came up with the data sets that started us down this path have either distroyed the data or are lying about where it is....
one wonders why
"Steel yourself for the new reality, because the data needed to verify the gloom-and-doom warming forecasts have disappeared.
Or so it seems. Apparently, they were either lost or purged from some discarded computer. Only a very few people know what really happened, and they aren’t talking much. And what little they are saying makes no sense."
Finally someone is writting about something that has been out there for a while. It seems the Authority on AGW who came up with the data sets that started us down this path have either distroyed the data or are lying about where it is....
one wonders why
"Steel yourself for the new reality, because the data needed to verify the gloom-and-doom warming forecasts have disappeared.
Or so it seems. Apparently, they were either lost or purged from some discarded computer. Only a very few people know what really happened, and they aren’t talking much. And what little they are saying makes no sense."
Yeah like I believe for one second that they don't have backup copies of this ever so important data. Something bigger is going on here, like a big fat lie!
LOL Now that Pat has been kick out of the University of Virginia, not exactly a hotbed of liberalism, and has found his work no longer acceptable in the professional peer review environment, we find him at CATO writing more shrill editorials. He's a sad case.
LOL Now that Pat has been kick out of the University of Virginia, not exactly a hotbed of liberalism, and has found his work no longer acceptable in the professional peer review environment, we find him at CATO writing more shrill editorials. He's a sad case.
Ahhh...you couldn't even debate the facts of the article, just attack the messenger. You can't take being wrong can you?
Ahhh...you couldn't even debate the facts of the article, just attack the messenger. You can't take being wrong can you?
There are no facts. It's a editorial from a guy who denies climate change. Even if his assertions are true, and Michaels has a very poor record for integrity, the data sets are irrelevant to today's discussion. The climate change community moved to more sophisticated temperature estimates years ago.
There are no facts. It's a editorial from a guy who denies climate change. Even if his assertions are true, and Michaels has a very poor record for integrity, the data sets are irrelevant to today's discussion. The climate change community moved to more sophisticated temperature estimates years ago.
you are so wrong... If there is no data to support their theory, there is no theory. That's the way science works, you just don't come up with something off the top of your head without any scientific data at all and call it a theory, and supposedly the oracle of all theories at that.
LOL Now that Pat has been kick out of the University of Virginia, not exactly a hotbed of liberalism, and has found his work no longer acceptable in the professional peer review environment, we find him at CATO writing more shrill editorials. He's a sad case.
here we go again.
Peer review (Code word for reviewd by fellows who agree with AGW)
Never the less, RLC, would you like to refute the fact that Jones and company have LOST their data sets?
the bases of all the work that claims AGW?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
