Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-27-2009, 04:02 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
There has been some discussion of constructing infrastructure which would be government-owned, and thus some discussion of just how involved the government should be in operating that infrastructure. There has also been some discussion of providing internet service free to specific groups of people, sometimes the groups are the disabled, sometimes the groups are unemployed people needing job training. As I said, I think I over-stated the possibility of a government ISP, but I think at this point, as far as the FCC is concerned, all possibilities are on the table. But the FCC is really actively asking for public participation on this.
There is a difference between funding HS access to the disabled and job seekers, and actually running an ISP. The running of ISPs will be done by private companies and the gov will fork out the money for the needy. That's the discussion, not that government will open their own shop to run an ISP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-28-2009, 08:11 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
There is a difference between funding HS access to the disabled and job seekers, and actually running an ISP. The running of ISPs will be done by private companies and the gov will fork out the money for the needy. That's the discussion, not that government will open their own shop to run an ISP.
Then I stand corrected. It seemed to me that the FCC hadn't ruled any possibilities out at this point, and given the numerous municipalities that have stepped into the ISP market, it didn't seem outlandish or even unreasonable as a consideration. But evidently you are more up to speed on this issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top