Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Unfortunately, your arguements are flim-flam. Please post factual links showing that there were any undercounts. All the news shows only overcounts, which are the direction the Obama admin wanted the report to go. Very FISHY.
You are not watching news shows. A news show would be careful to provide a balanced and in-depth presentation. You are watching ratings vehicles and allowing them to toy with your brain.
Yes all these errors in all these states and people are still trying to make excuses. Simply amazing. Talk about blind love
Yada, yada, yada. More than 130,000 individual reports have been processed into that recovery.gov system. How many errors would you expect to have found in such a pile? How many have been?
You are not watching news shows. A news show would be careful to provide a balanced and in-depth presentation. You are watching ratings vehicles and allowing them to toy with your brain.
Again, post the fact! Lets see them or you have nothing to debate.
Get real. Such measures are an integral part of everyday business and government decision-making. How much of our recent increase in sales was attributable to the expensive ad campaign we bought? Would it be worthwhile for us to renew that contract at the even higher rates they are now demanding that we pay? Who you gonna call when you want answers to questions like that?
Still defending the indefensible, are you?
Who would I call? Certainly not you. I would prefer someone with honesty and credibility. Qualities which you demonstrably lack.
Not when your claim is that the net change somehow rules out the identified moves in the opposite direction attributable to ARRA, and that has consistently been the claim. ARRA cannot have saved or created any jobs at all because unemployment has gone up. As you have just indicated, that is a stupid and completely meaningless argument.
Windbags only make themselves look sillier still in attempting hyperbolic ridicule of things when the only actual problem is that they in fact don't understand them.
Been there, done that. It is a matter of comparing a situtation as it actually was to the most likely way that it would have been absent some specified condition or other. This is done all the time. The techniques for it are quite robust and are widely practiced from all points across the political spectrum. Just because you don't know how to do it, doesn't mean that it can't be done.
Oh, I think I understand just fine- increasing unemployment means fewer people have jobs.
"Saved jobs" is liberal spin in an attempt to white wash policy failure. Again, I am sure that Obama gave the guy who thought that one up a big red star. Obama no longer has to face failure, he just makes up new "indices" to show progress, even when the facts show dismal failure.
Tell us some more marxist fairy tales, Saggy! Perhaps you could tell us how Stalin was really just a misunderstood good man. It will be as entertaining as your "saved jobs" tale. How about Uncle Joe really not starving 20 million Urkranians- they were just fat and needed a diet! Think of all the "saved food" that Stalin accomplished.
Yada, yada, yada. More than 130,000 individual reports have been processed into that recovery.gov system. How many errors would you expect to have found in such a pile? How many have been?
Excuses excuses excuses
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.