Climategate: Scientists destroyed raw data (global warming, money, support, kids)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.
It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.
The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.
I'd say this completes the debunking of this whole man made global warming scare created and manufactured by warm-mongering 'scientists'.
But these are scientists with awards, honors and Ph.D.s! Ed Begley, Jr. told me that I must only listen to peer review groups of climate scientists with this specific academic title beside their name, for they cannot steer you wrong!
The scientific model as practiced by the left: manufacture data to support your conclusion and destroy data which doesn't agree with your conclusion. So this is what's meant by restoring science to its rightful place. The inconvenient truth of data which demonstrably prove your thesis to be bogus is ignored or worse destroyed to push your political agenda. How very Gorewellian!
But these are scientists with awards, honors and Ph.D.s! Ed Begley, Jr. told me that I must only listen to peer review groups of climate scientists with this specific academic title beside their name, for they cannot steer you wrong!
I though that all Scientists and the New Science was infallible
Oh wait a minute, that's right, science is always ever evolving and ever self-correcting. All is safe again.
Who knows what's going on here - it could be very nefarious - but lack of evidence is not evidence to the contrary.
The first blow up was just about whether to include dissenting views in the final report - had nothing to do with the science. We'll see how this shakes out. Hopefully there will be repercussions if they are tampering with data.
I cannot believe El Gordo the Global god has not come out to address this! Oh wait he will not address any questions.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
