Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-22-2009, 07:26 AM
 
Location: Europe
2,735 posts, read 2,464,172 times
Reputation: 639

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheViking85 View Post
To both of you, for one, Swedish people are as diverse as anyone, and they have their problems too, like anyone. There is no "group of people who are exactly the same" They have immigrants, children of immigrants who only has Sweden as their "home" country, yet still faces living in two diffeent cultures, they have ethnic swedes, Lapps etc, etc.

They sure do have their fair share of problems, but they also have a fairly sound way of discussing and solving them. They don't blindly follow the directives they get from the EU, even if they're supposed to, possibly because ever since they joined the EU, there hasn't been a single day where the majority of the population wanted to be a member. To call them homogeneous is ignorant and based on lacking knowledge.

...Much like saying it's a classless society, which in no way it is, or has ever been.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-22-2009, 07:30 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
It looks like you conveniently overlooked the fact that Detroit was the home of GM, and they just filed BK, something that doesnt come from "higher profits",
BK doesn't come from competent management either.



Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
and Ford is located in Dearborn Michigan, which indeed is not Detroit..
Perhaps you can contact the narrator in the video and ask why a Ford logo on a building is featured early on in a video about 'Detroit'?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2009, 07:35 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
For those of you who think "Capitalism" caused Detroits problems, please tell me how Detroit will recover without it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2009, 07:38 AM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,986,362 times
Reputation: 3396
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
The Most Debt-Ridden States in America | Credit/Debt | Money/Investing | Mainstreet

Take note; 9 of 10 Least debt ridden states are Red.

Take note; 8 of 10 Most debt ridden states are Blue.
Take note; Blue states are typically intellectual centers with better colleges, and higher costs of living. The people are paid higher incomes, and have higher lines of credit.

Red state are mostly in the south and farm belt, where there are much lower costs of living, lower incomes, and lower lines of credit.

Nice try though!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2009, 07:39 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
BK doesn't come from competent management either.
Indeed bk can come for companies with competent management. Things like horse buggy companies, record companies etc come to mind..
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Perhaps you can contact the narrator in the video and ask why a Ford logo on a building is featured early on in a video about 'Detroit'?
I'm pointing out facts, you can dispute the video with the author..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2009, 07:43 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
Take note; Blue states are typically intellectual centers with better colleges, and higher costs of living. The people are paid higher incomes, and have higher lines of credit.

Red state are mostly in the south and farm belt, where there are much lower costs of living, lower incomes, and lower lines of credit.

Nice try though!
So your claiming that Republicans take their lines of credit to blue states, because, without lines of credits, you dont have capitalism
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2009, 07:47 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,982 posts, read 22,157,422 times
Reputation: 13806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefly View Post
Actually, Sanrene. Detroit is about as raw an example of capitalism at work as you will ever see.

An industry moved in, brought hundreds of thousands of jobs with it, and then the industry moved out and nothing replaced it.

Simultaneously, suburbia exploded with the Eisenhower Interstate Highway Act combined with the G.I. Bill and every middle class person went to claim their piece of the American dream, leaving their city behind in ruins.

Granted, unions haven't helped, but they have little to do with industries beyond the automakers there.
Wasn't it 40 years of liberalism, government interference and socialism that finally brought the "industry" down?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2009, 08:01 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,468,904 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Detroit's rise in auto manufacturing make the city into what it was at its height of prosperity and entrepreneurship? Without all the cottage industries and support businesses that grew up along with the auto plants, Detroit might still be just a little town of 200,000 or would have dried up completely like a lot of other towns have done in the post-Henry Ford era. Until NAFTA there was never a reason to believe that people would quit buying American cars and thus no need for the city to "diversify its portfolio." All of Michigan is in the process of diversifying away from the auto industry now but it's not an overnight process.
That's what happens. Everything from its people to its supportive businesses are centered around one major business. If that business fails so does everything around it. NAFTA was an inevitable. There is no such thing as isolationism anymore, that's barbaric. Now the thing that affected the auto industry so bad was its inability to change with the times. That can be directly attributed to its massive union influence who was unwilling to make any concessions till they had no choice. By then it was too late.

I've worked in union environments and it's not till the business is about to fail miserably and no payouts, benefits or retirement plans will get distributed till the union is willing to make concessions. Being in the union I thought they were for the little people too. I was all for getting everything I could out of those evil companies. It wasn't till I grew up that I understood how crippling having a union was to the company. All those companies that I worked for, that had unions, ended up moving elsewhere and into a marketplace where they would not be unionized.

People want to think it's still the times where child labor laws need to be enacted. You have a massive amount of Federal Protections that make unions obsolete now. Competition and an ability to innovate and mainstream is what makes companies able to stay afloat. That's just the way business works now. That policy of being able to innovate is what pushes people to stay educated and keep them on a continual self improvement plan. There is no stagnation that is rewarding anymore. The status quo is not the future.

In this case imagine if the companies would have been able to get rid of the added cost of all those extraordinary benefits and been able to lower its prices on its products to keep them comparable to what was going on in the rest of the market. I've seen figures in the range from $1,000-$2,000 per car. That's a significant difference into what changes people option to what they want to buy.

The fact that they're diversifying now just proves that the leadership in that city was happy with the status quo. It just makes people blind to what is actually going on in the world around them. It's almost too little too late now. The same principals can, and IMO, should be used in personal lives. If you're not willing to change with the times you end up sitting around thinking how did all this happen to me, why did I get left behind and now I can't compete because I'm too old to learn or change jobs/careers. I like to keep in mind that "it's never too late to learn."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2009, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Boston, MA
14,483 posts, read 11,285,313 times
Reputation: 9002
Quote:
Originally Posted by odinloki1 View Post
Actually as someone who grew up in the metro detroit area, the unions brought prosperity to the area. It died because of inept, greedy management shipping jobs overseas and stagnation in product development. Thats all management not unions. As usual evilnewbie, you need to wake up and face reality.
Maybe you can explain why my city (Boston) is going broke. Hint: The biggest expenditure for the city, by far, is education and the average salary for teachers is over 70,000/year. The teachers can retire after 23 years with 80% of their final year's payrate plus full benefits. Imagine retiring at age 46.

You now have a situation where you have two teachers who filled the same position in the school system who retired early, plus you have to hire a teacher to take their place. The city of Boston is now in the position of paying the salary and full benefits of three different people for one single position in the school system. This is the Teacher's Union in Massachusetts.

Guess who the management is? The taxpayer who doesn't even have a voice in the whole process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2009, 08:08 AM
 
Location: DFW
40,951 posts, read 49,198,692 times
Reputation: 55008
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
Take note; Blue states are typically intellectual centers with better colleges, and higher costs of living. The people are paid higher incomes, and have higher lines of credit.

Red state are mostly in the south and farm belt, where there are much lower costs of living, lower incomes, and lower lines of credit.

Nice try though!
Nice try but some of the best colleges in the US are also in the south and other red states. What you have offered is no excuse for states spending more then they take in from their citizens.

Maybe the Blue states need to adjust some of their wages of all their intellectual types so they don't go broke. It's not very intellectual to go broke and rely on the federal govt.

Are you saying there are better schools in Michigan then Texas ? I don't think so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top