Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-22-2010, 08:52 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,019,978 times
Reputation: 62204

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Reid will probably lose. I think Specter will lose, but that will be in the Primary to Sestak and Sestak will defeat Toomey. The GOP is not knocking off Boxer...
What I'm reading is the Republicans probably didn't come to their senses soon enough and put a strong candidate up against Ma'am Boxer and the Democrats have learned, from Massachusetts, that everything isn't a gimme so they aren't going to sit back and think they own the seat.

Still, Boxer is at her worst poll numbers...

The question is whether any of Boxer's opponents light the fire of tea party people. Just being NOT-Boxer isn't good enough, in my opinion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-22-2010, 08:59 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,019,978 times
Reputation: 62204
If I were the Republicans, I'd pay Scott Brown's campaign people to meet with the campaign people in other states and offer advice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2010, 09:16 AM
 
1,598 posts, read 1,936,818 times
Reputation: 1101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
Nobody liked the Republicans so they voted in all these Democrats, but now nobody likes these Democrats so they will vote in all these Republicans, but then...well, you see were I'm going with this.

Lather, rinse, repeat.
I see the same thing happening. Many incumbants, especially incumbant democrats, are gonna fall and fall hard. Also, Obama probably won't get re-elected but neither will his sucessor unless things magically turn around soon.

We as a nation no longer have any patience and expect instant results. While this is good in moderation I think we take it to extreme.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2010, 10:29 AM
 
1,747 posts, read 1,953,701 times
Reputation: 441
[
Quote:
quote=dubyanumberone;12561507]I see the same thing happening. Many incumbants, especially incumbant democrats, are gonna fall and fall hard. Also, Obama probably won't get re-elected but neither will his sucessor unless things magically turn around soon
.

Quote:
We as a nation no longer have any patience and expect instant results. While this is good in moderation I think we take it to extreme.
This could easily apply to "certain" individuals who wish they already could have rammed something else down our throats.
I see "others" taking things to an extreme.......far more than "WE" do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2010, 11:09 AM
 
9,879 posts, read 8,020,347 times
Reputation: 2521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sinajana View Post
[/b]


Then why did Brown get elected?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
True. And I see a faulty assumption being made by some Republicans: They believe that if Democrats are losing elections, it must mean that Americans are once again embracing Republican philosophies.
That logic aint making it.
Because 1,168,107 people in Massachusetts voted for him Turn out was high in some places: up to 70 some percent and very low in others - e.g. Boston turn out only 40 some percent. Brown did not win Boston - 69% Coakley/30% Brown.

Brown won the suburbs. The same places Hillary carried in
the primaries. Remember, Mass. has universal health care. Most folks polled who voted for Obama and voted for Brown thought Health care reform did not go far enough and overwhelmingly 82% were for a public option.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2010, 03:49 PM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,263,596 times
Reputation: 1578
bump
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2011, 02:18 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,155 posts, read 39,418,669 times
Reputation: 21252
Oh hey, it's been over a year
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2011, 04:40 AM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,364,082 times
Reputation: 7990
R's to control US Senate after 2012' is at 76.6 on Intrade now. IIRC 80% is considered virtually a done deal at intrade.

Dems really have only one chance at this pont--hope that 'big government' Republicans gain the upper hand, and screw things up like they did from 2000-2006 so that D's can have a chance to get back in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2011, 05:24 AM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,558,348 times
Reputation: 18814
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
R's to control US Senate after 2012' is at 76.6 on Intrade now. IIRC 80% is considered virtually a done deal at intrade.

Dems really have only one chance at this pont--hope that 'big government' Republicans gain the upper hand, and screw things up like they did from 2000-2006 so that D's can have a chance to get back in.
If they do gain back all three houses, this country will really be screwed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2011, 06:01 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,951,723 times
Reputation: 5661
Looking at the prediction of this 2010 thread, neither Boxer nor Reid lost, thankfully to the Tea Baggers who knocked off mainstream Republican candidates.

2012 is a year the Republicans should lose seats, not gain them, as they have shown their true colors to the American people. Republicans are for tax-cuts, as long as they are upper-income tax-cuts. Middle-class tax-cuts? Not-so-much.

It's no mystery that if the Republicans should take over all branches of government, they'll try to do what they always try to do -- privatize Social Security and Medicare and cut taxes on the rich. If the middle-class elect them, they deserve what they get.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top