Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-08-2010, 09:28 PM
 
27,623 posts, read 21,140,218 times
Reputation: 11095

Advertisements

Some Republicans who voted against the stimulus "have been all too happy to claim credit for Recovery Act projects and the jobs those projects have produced. They come to the ribbon cuttings."


-- Rep. Geoff Davis of Kentucky. Davis, a three-term congressman, issued a news release on Jan. 28, 2009, the day of the first House vote on the stimulus, in which he was quoted saying that "this so-called ‘stimulus’ legislation is full of pet spending projects that will do very little to restore confidence in our economy or create jobs."

But 11 months later, on Dec. 16, 2009, Davis sent out a release announcing the awarding of a $1 million-plus grant for the Carroll County School District.

-- Rep. Bill Shuster of Pennsylvania.

In November, the Blairsville (Pa.) Dispatch reported that Shuster attended a ceremonial groundbreaking for a new facility at a sewage treatment plant in Blairsville. According to the newspaper, the $12.1 million project was funded in part by federal stimulus money.


-- Rep. Phil Gingrey of Georgia. In a Feb. 13, 2009, news release, Gingrey, a four-term congressman, explained his vote by saying that "this ‘stimulus’ bill only perpetuates the dangerous myth that government spending will fix this economy. ... The truth is government spending will only bury future generations in more debt."

In October, a photograph in the Cedartown (Ga.) Standard showed Gingrey handing over a giant, ceremonial check for $625,000 in stimulus money to municipal leaders. The money was to pay for "new sidewalks, landscaping and other improvements to the downtown area,"

-- Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina. Burr voted against the stimulus yet appeared in person to present a $2 million-plus stimulus grant to help build a fire station to house the Bethlehem Community Volunteer Fire Department.

"This is a great thing for this county," Burr said, according to the Hickory (N.C.) Daily Record. "We're not accustomed to federal dollars in that magnitude finding their way to North Carolina."

None of the four House members cited above responded to a query from PolitiFact. But the spokesman for one senior Republican lawmaker -- House Minority Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia -- did return our call. He argued that the Democratic criticism is overblown.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...sed-stimulus-/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2010, 09:38 PM
 
Location: Highland, CA (formerly Newark, NJ)
6,183 posts, read 6,079,236 times
Reputation: 2150
What's funny is these were the same guys using the term "flip flop" every other sentence to describe Kerry in 04
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2010, 09:39 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,172,024 times
Reputation: 6195
>crickets<
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2010, 10:12 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,193 posts, read 19,476,372 times
Reputation: 5305
I would say I was surprised, but I would be lying.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2010, 10:19 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,138,171 times
Reputation: 9409
There are 218 Republicans in the House and Senate and the actions of 4 representatives is enough to make a stir? LOL

Boy, I tell ya, the liberal left are clamoring for anything at all to get some headline time. Those dastardly Republicans and their army of grandmas sure have neutered Democrats to the point of hilarity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2010, 10:22 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,172,024 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
There are 218 Republicans in the House and Senate and the actions of 4 representatives is enough to make a stir? LOL

Boy, I tell ya, the liberal left are clamoring for anything at all to get some headline time. Those dastardly Republicans and their army of grandmas sure have neutered Democrats to the point of hilarity.
In other words, hypocrites, sneaks and liars in the Republican Party? Yawn, tell AeroGuy something he didnt know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2010, 10:28 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,138,171 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
In other words, hypocrites, sneaks and liars in the Republican Party? Yawn, tell AeroGuy something he didnt know.
Four, count'm, four out of 218 Republicans who voted against the stimulus came forth in a bout of hypocrisy. Does that really amount to anything? Let's be serious here. If 40 or even 14 had come out to celebrate stimulus money after voting against it, then you may have a point. But come on, .018 percent of representatives amounting to $15 million out of $787 billion? LOL

Yeah, you all are grasping and its downright hilarious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2010, 11:09 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,172,024 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Four, count'm, four out of 218 Republicans who voted against the stimulus came forth in a bout of hypocrisy. Does that really amount to anything? Let's be serious here. If 40 or even 14 had come out to celebrate stimulus money after voting against it, then you may have a point. But come on, .018 percent of representatives amounting to $15 million out of $787 billion? LOL

Yeah, you all are grasping and its downright hilarious.
How about 68, then? And these are just from the House, I think.

www.dccc.org | Hypocrisy Hall of Fame
"It's bad enough House Republicans want to go back to the Bush Administration policies responsible for the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, but they’ve also tried to get away with taking credit for the economic benefits in their districts they tried to prevent. House Republicans need to immediately let their constituents know the truth – will they come out in favor of canceling funding in their congressional districts from President Obama’s economic recovery policies or will they continue taking credit for jobs and local projects they fought against?"
"Only 68," right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 01:06 AM
 
11 posts, read 11,476 times
Reputation: 27
1. Republicans vote against stimulus.
2. Republicans are impotent minority, unable to stop passage of stimulus.
3. Republicans accept stimulus money for benefit of their constituents.
4. Republicans get credit for fiscal prudence AND stimulus effects.

Hahahahahahahhahahaha. Perfect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 03:31 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,647 posts, read 26,398,078 times
Reputation: 12656
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
Some Republicans who voted against the stimulus "have been all too happy to claim credit for Recovery Act projects and the jobs those projects have produced. They come to the ribbon cuttings."


-- Rep. Geoff Davis of Kentucky. Davis, a three-term congressman, issued a news release on Jan. 28, 2009, the day of the first House vote on the stimulus, in which he was quoted saying that "this so-called ‘stimulus’ legislation is full of pet spending projects that will do very little to restore confidence in our economy or create jobs."

But 11 months later, on Dec. 16, 2009, Davis sent out a release announcing the awarding of a $1 million-plus grant for the Carroll County School District.

-- Rep. Bill Shuster of Pennsylvania.

In November, the Blairsville (Pa.) Dispatch reported that Shuster attended a ceremonial groundbreaking for a new facility at a sewage treatment plant in Blairsville. According to the newspaper, the $12.1 million project was funded in part by federal stimulus money.


-- Rep. Phil Gingrey of Georgia. In a Feb. 13, 2009, news release, Gingrey, a four-term congressman, explained his vote by saying that "this ‘stimulus’ bill only perpetuates the dangerous myth that government spending will fix this economy. ... The truth is government spending will only bury future generations in more debt."

In October, a photograph in the Cedartown (Ga.) Standard showed Gingrey handing over a giant, ceremonial check for $625,000 in stimulus money to municipal leaders. The money was to pay for "new sidewalks, landscaping and other improvements to the downtown area,"

-- Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina. Burr voted against the stimulus yet appeared in person to present a $2 million-plus stimulus grant to help build a fire station to house the Bethlehem Community Volunteer Fire Department.

"This is a great thing for this county," Burr said, according to the Hickory (N.C.) Daily Record. "We're not accustomed to federal dollars in that magnitude finding their way to North Carolina."

None of the four House members cited above responded to a query from PolitiFact. But the spokesman for one senior Republican lawmaker -- House Minority Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia -- did return our call. He argued that the Democratic criticism is overblown.

PolitiFact | Obama criticizes Republicans who opposed stimulus, then claim credit for projects it funded



Once again the blowhard in chief completely misses the larger point because he is too busy trying to score political brownie points to make use of a golden opportunity to lead. The highly destructive habit elected officials of both parties have of wasting tax payer's money on pork projects has saddled our children with an immoral transfer of debt that amounts to generational theft.

So they are just as guilty as you. It's nothing of which to be proud. That simply means they also failed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top