Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-18-2010, 11:23 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,164,267 times
Reputation: 6195

Advertisements

For those wondering why luxury spending is back even as unemployment hovers close to 10%, consider this: unemployment among the affluent is only 3%.
***
The differing rates of underemployment–including those working part-time for economic reasons–are also notable. Underemployment for the top 10% was 1.6%, while the bottom was 21%.

.... the data raise questions about the theory behind what is informally known as “trickle down” economics, since full employment at the top doesn’t seem to be translating into more jobs below. Of course, the current environment may be the exception, with the global financial crisis making the preservation of capital far more important than chasing even modest returns on investment.

Why do you think there is such a vast difference in the unemployment rates?

High Unemployment? Not for the Affluent - The Wealth Report - WSJ

Yeah.... I thought we had to protect rich people from paying higher household taxes because rich people create jobs.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-18-2010, 11:27 AM
 
2,229 posts, read 1,687,470 times
Reputation: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
For those wondering why luxury spending is back even as unemployment hovers close to 10%, consider this: unemployment among the affluent is only 3%.
***
The differing rates of underemployment–including those working part-time for economic reasons–are also notable. Underemployment for the top 10% was 1.6%, while the bottom was 21%.

.... the data raise questions about the theory behind what is informally known as “trickle down” economics, since full employment at the top doesn’t seem to be translating into more jobs below. Of course, the current environment may be the exception, with the global financial crisis making the preservation of capital far more important than chasing even modest returns on investment.

Why do you think there is such a vast difference in the unemployment rates?

High Unemployment? Not for the Affluent - The Wealth Report - WSJ

Yeah.... I thought we had to protect rich people from paying higher household taxes because rich people create jobs.

so... the rich business owner should lay himself off to stay profitable? Does that make sense to you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,799,372 times
Reputation: 24863
Nope, just pay a all sources progressive income tax as well a social security on all his income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 11:31 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,861,032 times
Reputation: 4585
It's just a minor irritation to many, well worth it to try to derail any recovery, and hence, Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 11:32 AM
 
2,229 posts, read 1,687,470 times
Reputation: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Nope, just pay a all sources progressive income tax as well a social security on all his income.
So by taxing the rich business owner more, that will reduce unemployment for middle income workers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 11:36 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,037 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Hmmm... explain the tax revenue discrepancies noted here:
//www.city-data.com/forum/12954061-post40.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 11:36 AM
 
175 posts, read 82,830 times
Reputation: 17
Well the right always says big business has to be protected to keep providing all those jobs....hmmmmmmmmm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 11:36 AM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,208,847 times
Reputation: 5481
Maybe they are affluent because they are the best of the best at their jobs - a segment that isn't going to be laid off anytime soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 11:38 AM
 
3,292 posts, read 4,475,416 times
Reputation: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcarlilesiu View Post
So by taxing the rich business owner more, that will reduce unemployment for middle income workers?
Definitely didn't work at all during the 1940's and 50's.

Top US Marginal Income Tax Rates, 1913--2003 (TruthAndPolitics.org)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 11:39 AM
 
2,229 posts, read 1,687,470 times
Reputation: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinkieMcGee View Post
Definitely didn't work at all during the 1940's and 50's.

Top US Marginal Income Tax Rates, 1913--2003 (TruthAndPolitics.org)

Of course it didn't. Taxing the rich, as GregW pointed out, has nothing to do with addressing middle income unemployment rates, and has everything to do with punishing due to envy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top