Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I love reading the fake sayings the extreme liberals on this forum make in order for their cause to look better.
Reduce the debt, smaller government. Those are 2 big issues with the Tea Party. Not to discount popular types like Beck and Palin but they are the Teocons latching on to the movement. Smaller government except for their causes. Go small, or go home.
Tea parties arent picking fights with democrats they are picking fights with the expansion of gov into our lives and the spending and taxes. If democrats are taking it as a fight against them thats on them
Unions needs to solve their own problems before they try and clean someone elses problems up.
The Tea Baggers are doing the bidding of big corporations. Do you see any of them going after Republican Congresspersons who support agribusiness? Of course not.
The Tea Party is run by Dick Armey, former Republican majority leader, so they'll never pick a fight with the Republicans because the whole thing is financed and run by Republicans. Essentially, after GWB the Republican brand name was worthless so Armey's big idea was to put a new label on the same old horse dung and pretend it was something new. A few suckers bought it but 82% of Americans saw through the lies.
"There’s just one element missing from these snapshots of America’s ostensibly spontaneous and leaderless populist uprising: the sugar daddies who are bankrolling it, and have been doing so since well before the “death panel” warm-up acts of last summer. Three heavy hitters rule. You’ve heard of one of them, Rupert Murdoch. The other two, the brothers David and Charles Koch, are even richer, with a combined wealth exceeded only by that of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett among Americans. But even those carrying the Kochs’ banner may not know who these brothers are.
When David Koch ran to the right of Reagan as vice president on the 1980 Libertarian ticket (it polled 1 percent), his campaign called for the abolition not just of Social Security, federal regulatory agencies and welfare but also of the F.B.I., the C.I.A., and public schools — in other words, any government enterprise that would either inhibit his business profits or increase his taxes. He hasn’t changed."
The biggest issue at hand right now is taking out our abysmal failure of a government. Once we completely restructure congress, and bring in a healthy, trustworthy conservative president again, we will be back on track.
The only thing that will bring us back on track is the complete dismantling of the current, so-called, "two-party" system.
"There’s just one element missing from these snapshots of America’s ostensibly spontaneous and leaderless populist uprising: the sugar daddies who are bankrolling it, and have been doing so since well before the “death panel” warm-up acts of last summer. Three heavy hitters rule. You’ve heard of one of them, Rupert Murdoch. The other two, the brothers David and Charles Koch, are even richer, with a combined wealth exceeded only by that of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett among Americans. But even those carrying the Kochs’ banner may not know who these brothers are.
When David Koch ran to the right of Reagan as vice president on the 1980 Libertarian ticket (it polled 1 percent), his campaign called for the abolition not just of Social Security, federal regulatory agencies and welfare but also of the F.B.I., the C.I.A., and public schools — in other words, any government enterprise that would either inhibit his business profits or increase his taxes. He hasn’t changed."
There was a terrific story on the Koch bros and others in the NYer a few weeks ago --
So who do you consider the last trustworthy conservative president???
"W" was a good war-time president. He did what was necessary to protect the nation regardless of the political consequences. Aside from that he was GHWBII in every RINO respect. Clinton's inaction gave us 9/11, and his actions gave us the subprime meltdown of 2008. The only conservative worth mentioning was the Gipper.
Alright, that's it, time to face reality and stop beating around the bush and pussyfooting around.
There is a very real, lunatic fringe movement in this country that's bent on the destruction of the Constitution along with middle income America.
Their end goal is the establishment of a pseudo-Christian fundamentalist, theocratic state with multi-nationals ruling territories as their own personal fiefdoms.
And you know what, they are right now infiltrating our political system to set their agenda into motion.
This is no sci-fi flick people, this ***** is for real.
"Dig a little deeper into her past record, however, and one gets the sense that O'Donnell's legislative outlook is basically scripted by her social and religious views. In a C-SPAN appearance the Huffington Post unearthed from December 1996, the Delaware Republican said it was a "misconception that you, quote unquote, can't legislate morality."
"The reality of that statement is that if you don't legislate one morality then you are legislating somebody else's morality," she said. "So you can't get around legislating morality."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
