Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Eh, we have all been down this road before. If folks claim to "pay for abortions" by buying health insurance then they can't actually buy anything or do anything without "paying fo abortions" in the same manner. It's a dead end argument but people may not realize it unless they can think logically.
Eh, we have all been down this road before. If folks claim to "pay for abortions" by buying health insurance then they can't actually buy anything or do anything without "paying fo abortions" in the same manner. It's a dead end argument but people may not realize it unless they can think logically.
I agree and quite frankly, I DONT CARE if it goes against their religious beliefs. Going to war was against mine but my tax bucks went to it anyways.
Eh, we have all been down this road before. If folks claim to "pay for abortions" by buying health insurance then they can't actually buy anything or do anything without "paying fo abortions" in the same manner. It's a dead end argument but people may not realize it unless they can think logically.
Thank you to Judge Ceece for citing who-knows-what legal precedent using who-knows-what legal training. Who needs the court system? We've got judge, attorney, and juror in one complete package right here on City Data.
Considering they aren't paying for abortions this is a total frivolous case. Any lawyer who knowingly brings a frivolous case to the court can be disbarred.
Thank you to Judge Ceece for citing who-knows-what legal precedent using who-knows-what legal training. Who needs the court system? We've got judge, attorney, and juror in one complete package right here on City Data.
You are quite welcome.
Surely you don't think this is the first "it's against my religion" argument ever made do you?
Surely you don't think this is the first "it's against my religion" argument ever made do you?
As it applies to Obamacare? Yes, I believe it is the first time a petitioner has used this argument.
Why don't we wait and see what the Court decides?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
