Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-20-2013, 02:37 PM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,268,303 times
Reputation: 2127

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
How many of those 40% are in households with two parents that never got married?
I don't know off the top of my head, but I have read in many places that this trend is rising fast, so it certainly accounts for some of the 40% the OP is wringing his/her hands over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-20-2013, 02:41 PM
 
2,635 posts, read 3,514,971 times
Reputation: 1686
What if a child were born to married parents of the same gender?
Is this a GOOD thing or a BAD thing???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,631,345 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke_Jaguar4 View Post
What if a child were born to married parents of the same gender?
Is this a GOOD thing or a BAD thing???
IMO, it's a good thing.

Better two married parents of the same gender than a single parent
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 04:39 PM
 
63,014 posts, read 29,223,046 times
Reputation: 18625
It is preferable for a child to have two parents that are married and living together for the obvious reasons. However, just as long as the taxpayer isn't expected to pay for them it is their choice to have babies out of wedlock. Unfortunately, we have far too many giving birth out of wedlock over and over knowing full well that the rest of us will have to foot the bill for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 04:42 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,750,743 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Stop moralizing! Every choice is equally good. 2 mommie, 2 daddies, 2 daddies and 1 mommy, 2 mommies and 1 daddy. 1 mommy no daddy, 1 daddy no mommy.... Well you get the point. 1 mommy and 1 daddy is simply repressive!
My money, My rules...keep you legs shut..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 04:45 PM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,690,317 times
Reputation: 9175
Quote:
Originally Posted by kellygreene View Post
I have no problem with single mothers, however no tax payer money should go to subsidize them.
Exactly!

No welfare, no SNAP, no TANF, no child care, no Section 8.....nothing.

If you're gonna spread 'em, take the responsibility that comes with it. Don't come crying to me for help!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 04:47 PM
 
Location: central Oregon
1,909 posts, read 2,541,292 times
Reputation: 2493
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
Revoke the status of women as a protected class and end AFDC, and the problem will diminish.
AFDC has ended.

It is now called TANF.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 04:54 PM
 
6,902 posts, read 7,545,486 times
Reputation: 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
Exactly!

No welfare, no SNAP, no TANF, no child care, no Section 8.....nothing.

If you're gonna spread 'em, take the responsibility that comes with it. Don't come crying to me for help!

You do realize all of those programs you listed above are NOT only for single parents. There are MARRIED couples including the elderly on those programs?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,080 posts, read 14,341,503 times
Reputation: 9789
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunlover View Post
My money, My rules...keep you legs shut..
How about "Keep your pants on."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,807,098 times
Reputation: 20675
Never mind. This thread is 3 years old.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top