Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon > Portland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-18-2019, 11:17 AM
 
Location: US
628 posts, read 819,287 times
Reputation: 656

Advertisements

I've been renting in Washington County, but what tends to be the favorite to live long term among Washington, Multnomah, or Clackamas? Concerns would be property taxes, quality of school district and crime. Multnomah being Portland city Proper seems like it would be like most major cities where the taxes and highest and city services spread out the thinnest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-18-2019, 01:39 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,725 posts, read 58,067,115 times
Reputation: 46190
Long term investment focus ... (for business, community, real estate, schools) is likely most secure in Washington County.

1) Intellectual populace (They are less likely to let their community self destruct)
2) Existing HUGE financial commitment from business, community, individuals (Lots of substantial wealth in Wash. County)
3) Forward looking infrastructure and growth management plan
4) Engaged community and citizens (In benefiting the community, not in special interest groups and protectionism)
5) Becoming more self sufficient rather than co-dependent.
6) Could potentially exist APART from Mult county.
7) More beneficial 'diversity' in Washington County (Including some GREAT community focused Christian churches)

My investment dollars and time investment would go to Washington County. (for future security / returns. )

YMMV
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2019, 01:43 PM
 
Location: US
628 posts, read 819,287 times
Reputation: 656
Should I also consider Clackamas if I'm employed the other side of town?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2019, 01:50 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,725 posts, read 58,067,115 times
Reputation: 46190
Parts of Clackamas are fine, it just doesn't have the industry wealth (leading high tech jobs), and has not spent / planned on significant forward looking infrastructure. (It gets VERY expensive to add, if delayed / lagging), Thus, WA County will be easiest place to GROW / thrive in the future (of the 3 you mentioned).

For a simple nice place to live (invest in community)...(if rural is OK). I prefer Corbett. The CGNSA will keep it nice. (no new growth allowed)
Near Mt Hood CC would be fine as well.

Personally..., I am not metro centric so I like the Columbia Gorge for preference, (living and business) tho I own businesses that need metro services and supplies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2019, 03:04 PM
 
Location: Henderson, NV
7,087 posts, read 8,637,620 times
Reputation: 9978
I’ve lived in both several times between Multnomah and Washington and I definitely find it hilarious how Washington County is so much better yet my property taxes are only 60% of what they were in Portland. The roads are also meticulously maintained here in Beaverton, they really are nice, whereas they’re just in tatters and constant disrepair in Portland like it’s a third world country. Skyline is full of potholes, trees have ruined sidewalks all over Portland, it’s just ghetto for such high taxes. There’s nothing nice about it. I don’t know where they’re spending the money but it doesn’t benefit regular citizens whatsoever!

My neighbors are diverse in all of the best ways - not diversity for diversity’s sake - which means Indian, Hispanic, Asian, etc. and working at Nike, Intel, Adidas, and other local businesses. It’s really beautiful to see, just great people, everyone focused on their work and their families, and no homeless people around anywhere to be seen. The “suburbs” get a lot of flak for not being “cool,” but I’ll take boring Beaverton over homeless infested Portland any day! Especially with those tax savings.

PS: Even every single employee at the Beaverton post office branch is extremely nice and friendly I can say. I’ve been there roughly 15 times this year as I’ve sold a bunch of stuff before a move and I’ve had the chance to visit with all 4 regulars and another few too, they’ve gone out of their way to help me and give advice. It’s amazing, I’ve never seen happy, friendly people at any post office anywhere I’ve been... until I lived in Beaverton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2019, 02:59 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
10,990 posts, read 20,570,522 times
Reputation: 8261
One of Washington County's advantages is that its construction is relatively new. Roads, sewer lines and other basic resources haven't had the time to wear out.

Like many long term residents of Portland, I am disgusted with the homeless problem which in my opinion is the result of the failure of the State to provide mental health services and drug abuse. This is a relatively (15 year) development. Setting aside this social problem...

Portland had combined storm and sewer lines dating back to the day when sewer treatment didn't exist and the attitude common in that era that the solution to pollution is dilution. The city fought the Feds for years over whether or not our reservoirs need to be covered (what's a little bird poop now in then). Water and sewer charges have skyrocketed - not to mention that one of the City Commissioners threw in a couple of boondoggles.

Many of our streets are in bad need of repair, so much so that potholes are getting to be inverse speed bumps. Add that to the fact that much of the construction that involved tapping sewer and stormwater lines resulted in poorly installed asphalt repair. I would love to see the City's plan for road repair. The City grew by annexing surrounding communities east of the Willamette. The City will not maintain a road that was not built to standard and some of those neighborhoods had just gravel roads. Each property must pay their share to build a road and the residents have refused to do that... but they are demanding that the City build them a decent road. Oh, the drama...

The differences in the performance of each of the Portland Public Schools is in large part a reflection of the aspirations of the parents of the students. PPS has also had to absorb a huge increase in its student population and also has a high % of special needs students as the City has a number of social and medical services for those kids. Add all of that to the fact that almost all of the school buildings are well beyond their design life and need significant repair/replacement.

Basically, the City of Portland is an old lady, communities to the west are in the bloom of their life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2019, 05:45 PM
 
Location: WA
5,451 posts, read 7,743,493 times
Reputation: 8554
Yes, this...^^

Portland has massive legacy infrastructure costs and a political system that seems incapable of making rational decisions when it comes to things like spending priorities.

On the other hand, most of Portland was developed pre-WW2 and so didn't make a lot of the same mistakes that the sprawling suburbs have made in terms of low-density car-dependent sprawl that will be much harder to maintain and service in the future. So I expect Portland to age better long-term than the more sprawling car-centric suburbs.

It's also hard to generalize by county. I think a lot of people would be surprised to learn that Clackamas County is the wealthiest county in OR per-capita: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...-capita_income because it is easy to forget it includes Lake Oswego and West Linn. We tend to think of Clackamas County as that vague area of sprawl out by the Clackamas Mall on 205 and then running out to the rural towns like Estacada and Canby.

For best quality of life, live near where you work regardless of county.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2019, 01:40 PM
 
Location: SNA=>PDX 2013
2,793 posts, read 4,071,120 times
Reputation: 3300
I'd stay out of Multnomah County. In the 6 years I've been here, I've heard of 3 bonds that passed to increase their property taxes, some included Clackamas and Washington. And yes, the residents keep voting it in. Looks like the last one in 2018 was for low-income housing in the 3 counties.

Quote:
Originally Posted by texasdiver View Post
For best quality of life, live near where you work regardless of county.
This ^^

I know people who live in Beaverton and work in Hillsboro. 10 miles. 20-40 min commute with all the new construction and construction in general. A couple of others cross the river (20 miles) and their commute is 60-90 mins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2019, 02:52 PM
 
Location: WA
5,451 posts, read 7,743,493 times
Reputation: 8554
Quote:
Originally Posted by psichick View Post
I'd stay out of Multnomah County. In the 6 years I've been here, I've heard of 3 bonds that passed to increase their property taxes, some included Clackamas and Washington. And yes, the residents keep voting it in. Looks like the last one in 2018 was for low-income housing in the 3 counties.



This ^^

I know people who live in Beaverton and work in Hillsboro. 10 miles. 20-40 min commute with all the new construction and construction in general. A couple of others cross the river (20 miles) and their commute is 60-90 mins.
Yes, I have a handful of neighbors here in Camas who commute daily to tech jobs in the Beaverton-Hillsboro area. Insane and soul-sucking. Just buy a house in Beaverton and get your life back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2019, 06:06 PM
 
Location: Just outside of Portland
4,828 posts, read 7,455,954 times
Reputation: 5117
I once calculated that if I moved 1/16 of a mile south to Clackamas County, I would save over 800 bucks a year in taxes and utility costs.


That was ten years ago............................
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon > Portland

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top