Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
 [Register]
Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary The Triangle Area
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-23-2018, 10:10 AM
 
269 posts, read 321,929 times
Reputation: 281

Advertisements

I haven't heard any complaints recently about the signal lights installed on 540 ramps a few months back. I'm fortunate to be able to avoid 540 on my commute, but have seen occasional backups on Creedmoor in the morning. Just wondering if they are helping or hurting the rush hour commute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-24-2018, 07:17 AM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
3,644 posts, read 8,581,720 times
Reputation: 4505
My observations:
- Most people abide by the signals. I do see a lot blow through the lights without care but I'm actually surprised most people abide by them.
- Traffic backups on 540 have been drastically reduced.
- The lights work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
6,654 posts, read 5,590,752 times
Reputation: 5537
Quote:
Originally Posted by underPSI View Post
My observations:
- Most people abide by the signals. I do see a lot blow through the lights without care but I'm actually surprised most people abide by them.
- Traffic backups on 540 have been drastically reduced.
- The lights work.
From the Google Maps traffic layer (not sure if enough data has been collected to show traffic post-ramp meters), it looks like Falls of Neuse is still pretty bad. But that's not the fault of the ramp meter itself, it's just too many people trying to get onto 540 from that road.

That's great to hear though that otherwise, it's working as intended.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 08:03 AM
 
3,669 posts, read 6,577,091 times
Reputation: 7158
I use 540 just about every day and while I'm loathe to admit it, I think it's working.

The only source of frustration is that some drivers simply miss reacting to when the light turns green, and as someone who cut his teeth driving up in NYC, this is maddening. Fortunately, it's not a frequent problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 09:30 AM
 
2,819 posts, read 2,585,020 times
Reputation: 3554
They work for 540 but really back up falls of neuse at peak times. I adjusted and go in well before 7 and haven’t had any issues but if I’m later it can be bad enough to cut over to six forks or even capital.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 09:43 AM
 
4,263 posts, read 4,715,503 times
Reputation: 4084
The question is, how many people have fled to Strickland-Leesville-Westgate-Lumley.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 01:00 PM
 
1,188 posts, read 2,546,002 times
Reputation: 856
Quote:
Originally Posted by pierretong1991 View Post
From the Google Maps traffic layer (not sure if enough data has been collected to show traffic post-ramp meters), it looks like Falls of Neuse is still pretty bad. But that's not the fault of the ramp meter itself, it's just too many people trying to get onto 540 from that road.

That's great to hear though that otherwise, it's working as intended.
Well, to be fair, they said that backups on secondary roads would remain or get worse. The key is the total commute time. If you lose 5 minutes from increased backups on Falls, but gain 10 minutes on 540, then you still get a net gain of 5 minutes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
3,644 posts, read 8,581,720 times
Reputation: 4505
Quote:
Originally Posted by pierretong1991 View Post
From the Google Maps traffic layer (not sure if enough data has been collected to show traffic post-ramp meters), it looks like Falls of Neuse is still pretty bad. But that's not the fault of the ramp meter itself, it's just too many people trying to get onto 540 from that road.

That's great to hear though that otherwise, it's working as intended.
Signals aren't supposed to help secondary road.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYC2RDU View Post
I use 540 just about every day and while I'm loathe to admit it, I think it's working.

The only source of frustration is that some drivers simply miss reacting to when the light turns green, and as someone who cut his teeth driving up in NYC, this is maddening. Fortunately, it's not a frequent problem.
These are the same drivers who sit at a traffic signal after it turns green. Too busy staring at their phone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 01:26 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
6,654 posts, read 5,590,752 times
Reputation: 5537
Quote:
Originally Posted by boardjnky4 View Post
Well, to be fair, they said that backups on secondary roads would remain or get worse. The key is the total commute time. If you lose 5 minutes from increased backups on Falls, but gain 10 minutes on 540, then you still get a net gain of 5 minutes.
True. I'd love to see if NCDOT has done a recent travel time study of the 540 ramp meters. I know they did one earlier but that was still when everyone was trying to get acclimated to them. The travel time savings might be even greater now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2018, 09:08 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
2,743 posts, read 4,828,538 times
Reputation: 3949
I'd also like to see updated statistics, IE:

Extra time added to the 20 (30?) drivers waiting behind the ramp lights, vs.
how much the gridlock delay has been reduced for the 200, (2000?) drivers on the Interstate, upstream of the merge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top