Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Real Estate Professionals
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-31-2015, 06:50 AM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL (Mandarin)
2,560 posts, read 6,503,839 times
Reputation: 1840

Advertisements

I've been seeing some ads for a company selling a [very pricey] 3D camera kit that will create 3D virtual tours for listings. Potential customers would basically enter a 3D shell on their computer screen and be able to navigate the property. Do you think something like this is necessary and/or useful for marketing your real estate listings? Part of me thinks they are a large step beyond the silly looking, fish-eye 360-degree tours that have been out there for a while. But would a 3D virtual tour be "too much" for a listing? Should pictures/video be enough to get folks in the door?

Other thoughts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-31-2015, 07:06 AM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,292 posts, read 77,129,965 times
Reputation: 45657
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricBoyd View Post
I've been seeing some ads for a company selling a [very pricey] 3D camera kit that will create 3D virtual tours for listings. Potential customers would basically enter a 3D shell on their computer screen and be able to navigate the property. Do you think something like this is necessary and/or useful for marketing your real estate listings? Part of me thinks they are a large step beyond the silly looking, fish-eye 360-degree tours that have been out there for a while. But would a 3D virtual tour be "too much" for a listing? Should pictures/video be enough to get folks in the door?

Other thoughts?
To some degree, I think it is a shtick, and is more about selling the listing service, to "Wow!" the sellers than it is to sell the house to buyers.
When it gets much more realistic, and more people have very high speed internet, maybe that thought will change.


A buyers' market may move the needle a little on that, so local circumstances are the gauge. In a sellers' market, it gets easier to get showings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2015, 07:10 AM
 
2,600 posts, read 8,794,210 times
Reputation: 2483
I personally think that it helps sell a home as long as the agent isn't in the picture.

There's an app called "Dermandar" that's free for android phones, $1.99 for Iphones and it can be used for all types of pictures.

Android - https://play.google.com/store/apps/d...panorama&hl=en

Iphone - https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/dmd-...441183050?mt=8
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2015, 07:19 AM
 
2,563 posts, read 3,684,215 times
Reputation: 3573
Virtual Reality headsets will be available to consumers this year. Maybe they're already out there. In any event, I'm sure that VR tours of real estate will eventually become part of the online shopping experience. Why not?

They already do something like that on car sites. For example, you click on "Interior" and then you can spin the picture around with your mouse. Not VR, but still, better than a regular picture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2015, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Georgia
4,577 posts, read 5,667,145 times
Reputation: 15978
I don't see the ROI for this yet. In our market, the cost for the 3D photography is at a minimum of $.50 per sq. foot, so for an average 3,000 square feet, that's $1,500 for photos and a virtual tour -- about a 500% increase over a typical photo shoot. Not worth it now in a sellers market, when often homes sell before we get the professional pictures back from the photographer, but as MikeJaquish mentioned, it may have uses in a buyer's market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2015, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Michigan
2,745 posts, read 3,018,615 times
Reputation: 6542
I'd say it might be worth it for the real high-end priced houses.

Then again, IF some agents would only take better, clearer, and MORE photos, (I like to see at least 20-25) that makes all the difference right there IMO. I'm always suspicious of houses and have very few photos, and/or some that are out of focus. Every time my wife and I have looked at houses such as this in person (we used to buy, rehab, and resell) it turns out the agent WAS in fact hiding up front deal killers.

Why be sneaky about it? FULL DISCLOSURE is the only way to go, that includes photos that show the bad with the good. There's always a buyer at the proper price, regardless of "how bad" a place may be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2016, 10:20 AM
 
Location: Georgia
4,577 posts, read 5,667,145 times
Reputation: 15978
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeBear View Post
I'd say it might be worth it for the real high-end priced houses.
.
And even then, maybe not. We have a house that we are marketing that is almost 14,000 sf. No way I am spending $7,000 for a 3D view. I want people IN the house to experience the ambiance, the soaring ceilings, the beautiful trim, the fabulous gardens, the luxurious baths -- I don't want a cold 3D tour. There's a video tour, and a website with about 100 photos. 3D would be kinda cool, but overkill - it's not going to bring in a buyer on it's own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2016, 06:23 AM
 
Location: Boise, Idaho
820 posts, read 1,069,044 times
Reputation: 928
I love doing 3D tours on my listings and both buyers and sellers love it. It shows the house so well, you actually get less showings in person since people have already virtually walked through the home (without having to bother the seller). I use the tours to take screen captures for my listing photos so I am not having to pay for a second photographer.

As far as Virtual Reality goggles, we aren't quite ready for them in real estate yet. I have had the GearVR headset for over a year that attaches to my Samsung Galaxy Note 4 for the computer & screen. For now, to take a 3D tour that I have already shot rendered into a VR format would run about another $500. Since I am the only person I know with the headset, it doesn't make sense to do it for a single listing at a time. For a major project, or condos etc., it might still make sense.

My cost for the 3D tours is very affordable as the following one cost me about $400. https://my.matterport.com/show/?m=3WZRgzu3fnk&brand=0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2016, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Mobile/Baldwin County - AL
34 posts, read 71,212 times
Reputation: 58
Very cool 3D tour IdahoBroker! Sure beats bad pics. My all-time favorite are pics of the corner of a small bedroom where you only see the corner and a little bit of the window. Ugh!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2016, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
19,437 posts, read 27,844,220 times
Reputation: 36108
Quote:
Originally Posted by IdahoBroker View Post
I love doing 3D tours on my listings and both buyers and sellers love it. It shows the house so well, you actually get less showings in person since people have already virtually walked through the home (without having to bother the seller). I use the tours to take screen captures for my listing photos so I am not having to pay for a second photographer.

As far as Virtual Reality goggles, we aren't quite ready for them in real estate yet. I have had the GearVR headset for over a year that attaches to my Samsung Galaxy Note 4 for the computer & screen. For now, to take a 3D tour that I have already shot rendered into a VR format would run about another $500. Since I am the only person I know with the headset, it doesn't make sense to do it for a single listing at a time. For a major project, or condos etc., it might still make sense.

My cost for the 3D tours is very affordable as the following one cost me about $400. https://my.matterport.com/show/?m=3WZRgzu3fnk&brand=0
From consumer point of view:

I had to change browsers on my tablet to view the 3D tour. It took much too long to navigate through the entire house (in fact, I gave up after awhile ). It dudnt appeal to me at all.

(PS I can't believe these sellers allowed photos to be taken with the multiple dog beds, all that crap in the office, and the upstairs bedroom looking like a pig sty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Real Estate Professionals
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top