Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-12-2007, 11:51 AM
 
27 posts, read 120,596 times
Reputation: 32

Advertisements

I'm a writer working on a story about if it's a good idea for sellers to get a home inspection before listing and I was hoping to interview some real estate professionals who reccomend doing this and why and/or who have had sales fall apart or nearly fall apart over something that could have been taken care of if the seller had paid for an inspection before listing. You can contact me at richard.hazeltine@move.com

Thanks,

Rick Hazeltine
Editor/Writer
move.com/realtor.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-12-2007, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
2,124 posts, read 8,843,475 times
Reputation: 818
Richard, I believe that it is a good idea for sellers to have an inspection prior to putting their home on the market, and make the corrections correctly, but their way. When I sold my home recently (last June in chesterfield, Va), I had a home inspection. Had a couple of issues that we quickly fixed. When the home inspector came for the buyers, nothing, nothing was on the report... We sailed through. and closed quickly.

In this new buyers market, I am finding that buyers want the home they are purchasing to be pristine. They feel that if they are paying that much for a home (even with seller concessions), it better be nice and they don't want to do any work. So the better a home owner can get their home for showings, the quicker it can sell, usually a quicker sale will bring more money than a later sale.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Shelly
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2007, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Just south of Denver since 1989
11,828 posts, read 34,440,909 times
Reputation: 8986
I agree with Shelly.

A pre-inspected house shows the buyer that the seller is serious, and has taken care of whatever issues were brought forward in the inspection.

Relocation companies have been pre-inspecting houses for decades.

Having a pre-inspection, in no way, shape or form, replaces the buyer's own inspection.

With foreclosures on the rise, I fully expect that lender owned properties will follow suit. They are already painting, carpeting and putting in new appliances.

Since when does Move.com give home sellers advice?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2007, 05:15 PM
 
Location: Mount Pleasant, SC
22 posts, read 128,541 times
Reputation: 14
I pay for a home inspection for my sellers when I list their home. The inspection gives us an opportunity to know what needs to be taken care of, and therefore shelters my sellers from difficult inspection addendum negotiations after ratifiying a contract...preserving the sales price for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2007, 09:54 PM
 
Location: Happy wherever I am - Florida now
3,360 posts, read 12,270,334 times
Reputation: 3909
I agree it's a good idea for the sellers to get a pre-listing inspection so they can fix whatever needs to be done. The reason is that something that may cost, say $200 to fix in actuality, buyers get spooked about and think the same repair will cost ten times as much to fix. This is bad when you're trying to get your price.

The same applies if you need new carpeting and such.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2007, 10:01 PM
 
Location: NW Las Vegas - Lone Mountain
15,756 posts, read 38,208,368 times
Reputation: 2661
Here in Las Vegas we rarely see a home more than 20 years old.

In this marketplace a pre-inspection is meaningless. You agent can tell you at lest 90% of what will be found and the client knew about 90% of that.


**************
There well be broken roof tiles. Ninety eight percent of the homes in Las Vegas with tile roofs have broken tiles. And no one has looked closely at the other two percent.

There will be electrical box that are uncovered, broken, or loose.

At least two faucets/shower heads will leak or operate impropely.

In every house at least one mechanical sink stopper does not operate properly.

Pet doors to garages violate fire codes. (Never fix...50 50 the new owner will want it violation and all.) And fold down stairs in garage ceilings also violate fire codes...80% of buyers will accept them.

One or more sinks will have a leak under them. Watch refrigerators as well. This is M word stuff so clean it up before anybody inspects it.

On a slab house the periphery will leak in at least one location. Check for distorted baseboards or rusted carpet tack strips.

50 50 there is a missing piece of insulation or a loose duct in the attic.

Vacuum breakers on external water faucets never work.

At least one sprinkler sprays the stucco.

**********************

Should you find and fix these? Well I would certainly do all the ones that involve water...the M word...but the others? I am convince that every roof in Las Vegas has at least six broken tiles at all times. Even right after the roof guy has certified he has got them all. So maybe better to let them find the ones they can see and fix quick?

To bottom line it I know of no case where a pre-inspection would have prevented a big problem. Not that there were no probkems. We have lost at least six deals in the last five years to mold alone. But I think in all but one case the mold was known to the owner. The other case it was not but it would not have been detected in any normal inspection.

In fact in my marketplace the only seller inspection that might make sense would be a good mold guy. Note however there is a degree of risk. Mold, once detected by a professional, is forever...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2007, 06:11 AM
 
Location: Morehead City, NC
1,681 posts, read 6,030,928 times
Reputation: 1277
All negatives are a positive to a buyer-That's how we handle the situation. Sellers generally are aware of adverse situations or at least are suspect of them. The reason why sellers don't want to have a home inspection and correct problems is the expense of the inspection and subsequent repairs(usually nominal) and the inconvenience (usually the true culprit).
So when we represent buyers we look for problems and potential problems and adjust our offer accordingly.
Remember this-When someone gets to the point of selling, mentally-They have already moved. They want to get on with life and their current situation is a anchor prohibiting progress.
Buyers solve this problem and the lower the price the quicker the problem can be solved.
When representing sellers-We highly encourage a home inspection. First and foremost-We want to make sure that the house "is" as we think it "is"-Solid!! Secondly-we want to remove all tangible objections from the buyer. We defeat the price objection because we price a home fair and accurate.
So for the buyer-This only leaves one objection and that would be if the home is just, "not their cup of tea" and there's nothing we can do about that.
Bill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2007, 10:06 PM
 
Location: Tempe (Phoenix) AZ
46 posts, read 284,125 times
Reputation: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by MayorCheryll View Post
I pay for a home inspection for my sellers when I list their home. The inspection gives us an opportunity to know what needs to be taken care of, and therefore shelters my sellers from difficult inspection addendum negotiations after ratifiying a contract...preserving the sales price for them.
It sounds like you really give your clients a good deal for their trust in you. I did have one agent offer here in Tempe, AZ to pay our home inspection to represent us as the sellers agent. We are going to have our home inspected next week in preperation for possible selling, and the cost is less then $350 which I think is a good deal. I just wish they could do the fixes needed too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2007, 05:01 AM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,299 posts, read 77,129,965 times
Reputation: 45659
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Hitchcock View Post
All negatives are a positive to a buyer-That's how we handle the situation. Sellers generally are aware of adverse situations or at least are suspect of them. The reason why sellers don't want to have a home inspection and correct problems is the expense of the inspection and subsequent repairs(usually nominal) and the inconvenience (usually the true culprit).
So when we represent buyers we look for problems and potential problems and adjust our offer accordingly.
Remember this-When someone gets to the point of selling, mentally-They have already moved. They want to get on with life and their current situation is a anchor prohibiting progress.
Buyers solve this problem and the lower the price the quicker the problem can be solved.
When representing sellers-We highly encourage a home inspection. First and foremost-We want to make sure that the house "is" as we think it "is"-Solid!! Secondly-we want to remove all tangible objections from the buyer. We defeat the price objection because we price a home fair and accurate.
So for the buyer-This only leaves one objection and that would be if the home is just, "not their cup of tea" and there's nothing we can do about that.
Bill
Excellent information, Bill.
Good for a rep point.
I encourage presales inspections because of the Cost of Repair Contingency in Alternative 1 of the standard NC Realtors' Offer to Purchase and Contract.
Repair costs taken off the table prior to listing and contract will not contribute to reaching the threshold where the Buyer can unilaterally walk away from the transaction. Again, this is a North Carolina convention.

IOW, ALL REAL ESTATE IS LOCAL! This question can be answered differently, yet accurately, in different states, due to variations in state laws and local customs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2008, 05:34 PM
 
3 posts, read 25,762 times
Reputation: 11
I have been a home inspector for over 25 yrs . in Ma. and have recomended to realtors to consider pushing the seller to having an inspection. they continue to resist the suggestion . the general reply they say is im selling my house why should i have expenses ? I suggest your house is an asset and you should know it value and or its defects . Only then can a tru value be estabilished . an example might be an expensive necklace or dimond ring if you purchased the jewlry they apraised it and made you aware of it perfectiness or imperfections color karat settings quality of gold etc. and then there is the insurance to protect those assets. in most cases the house is worth much more than the jewlry. Now i have been told that attys. suggest ignorance is best when a home owner is selling that way they cant be held responsible .so they tend to suggest against a pre inspection for thier client . Lets say im selling my house I 1st get an atty. then a realtor to list my property and I tell my realtor that im going to have a pre home insp. and use that report to consider what might be discovered at an inspection . If there are things that need repais or replacement a dollar value should be associated with the items ,and a consideration should be made to a reduction in the selling price of the home . with this done i would say to my realtor you said my house should sell for x and i have deducted $ from x to arive at at selling price x-$ please explain to the buyers rep. these facts and recomend they have there own home inspect . If additional item are found on the inspection then its back to the negotiation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top