Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
An in-law of mine claimed to have slept with over 500 men by the time she was in her late 20's. She lived in NYC as a teen and young adult and didn't slow down at all when she moved down to Florida. She dated mostly thugs/drug dealers and had several sugar daddies while I knew her. She's now in her mid-thirties and still at it. She is extremely intelligent, highly manipulative and exhibits some bipolar tendencies.
I've known other girls who were extremely promiscuous, most had issues and messed up childhoods. With the exception of one female friend, who grew up a military brat, with both parents, in a pretty normal household. I am not sure what her number is but I am sure its exceedingly high. When her child was born there was questions as to who the father was.
I think that women lie about their number, no doubt about. The rule of thumb is to multiply by 3 whatever number your given.
An in-law of mine claimed to have slept with over 500 men by the time she was in her late 20's. She lived in NYC as a teen and young adult and didn't slow down at all when she moved down to Florida. She dated mostly thugs/drug dealers and had several sugar daddies while I knew her. She's now in her mid-thirties and still at it. She is extremely intelligent, highly manipulative and exhibits some bipolar tendencies.
I've known other girls who were extremely promiscuous, most had issues and messed up childhoods. With the exception of one female friend, who grew up a military brat, with both parents, in a pretty normal household. I am not sure what her number is but I am sure its exceedingly high. When her child was born there was questions as to who the father was.
I think that women lie about their number, no doubt about. The rule of thumb is to multiply by 3 whatever number your given.
That just sounds like daddy issues... either that or she's a prostitute.. I just couldn't image 500 by the time you're late 20's... I mean it just sounds like a concerted effort, I mean really....
I just couldn't have have anything to do with a woman who's banged 500 dudes by the time she's 28 or so..... it just sounds like prostitute material... LOl... Call me funny or old fashioned...
An in-law of mine claimed to have slept with over 500 men by the time she was in her late 20's. She lived in NYC as a teen and young adult and didn't slow down at all when she moved down to Florida. She dated mostly thugs/drug dealers and had several sugar daddies while I knew her. She's now in her mid-thirties and still at it. She is extremely intelligent, highly manipulative and exhibits some bipolar tendencies.
I've known other girls who were extremely promiscuous, most had issues and messed up childhoods. With the exception of one female friend, who grew up a military brat, with both parents, in a pretty normal household. I am not sure what her number is but I am sure its exceedingly high. When her child was born there was questions as to who the father was.
I think that women lie about their number, no doubt about. The rule of thumb is to multiply by 3 whatever number your given.
She should have recorded the sessions. And would have made 1000's via porn online.
Maybe she already did lol.
That just sounds like daddy issues... either that or she's a prostitute.. I just couldn't image 500 by the time you're late 20's... I mean it just sounds like a concerted effort, I mean really....
I just couldn't have have anything to do with a woman who's banged 500 dudes by the time she's 28 or so..... it just sounds like prostitute material... LOl... Call me funny or old fashioned...
If a female I was dating told me that i would go to the store and buy 500 hot dogs and lay them on my bed and say to myself no thanks that is about 490 to many .
If a female I was dating told me that i would go to the store and buy 500 hot dogs and lay them on my bed and say to myself no thanks that is about 490 to many .
Thats the main reason I don't use hookers for sex. I find it very off putting knowing she has been with 100's or 1000's of guys. BJ's are all good though.
She should have recorded the sessions. And would have made 1000's via porn online.
Maybe she already did lol.
If she's a pro that's fine.. I just don't want an average woman on the street to be "normal"... most normal women aren't racking up them numbers... but a pro, well they rack them up... at least you know what you're getting... I guess I just don't like to be surprised....
If she's a pro that's fine.. I just don't want an average woman on the street to be "normal"... most normal women aren't racking up them numbers... but a pro, well they rack them up... at least you know what you're getting... I guess I just don't like to be surprised....
Very rare IMO for a non pro girl to have that high a number.
No idea what this remark is meant to indicate. I am discussing this subject because this is what this thread is about. What else would you want me to be discussing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic 2.0
But we don't always know the tradeoff either.
Exactly why I am saying it is contextual. As you appear to agree here and the next paragraph you replied with after this too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic 2.0
"Ideal" because since we all want to be sexually satisfied, and I contend that can happen for every person by just being with one sexual partner
It is the inclusion of "can" instead of "will" here that makes my point for me - there is no "ideal" here because it is entirely contextual and personal. The "ideal" you present is simply your own personal one. For example you say we all want to be sexually satisfied. For some this is simply not attainable until they have sexually experimented with more than one person or type of sex etc etc. It is _your own_ measure of "satisfied" you are taking to the conversation and therefore your own version of "ideal" you are putting forward as if near universal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic 2.0
All other things being equal, however?
Ah Rhetorics. Great. All other things are never equal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic 2.0
But just enough to hear it well would be that ideal, in my view. If we controlled for all other factors (brand of stereo, proximity to the speakers, song, other noises, etc.), we could run experiments to find exactly how much exposure at what volumes would hurt our hearing, stuff like that.
But you can not control for such things when measuring subjective preferences. Because once you find an EQ balance that pleases someone you can move one of the knobs and then ALL the other knobs except that one can be moved to find another equally "ideal" balance.
It is the inclusion of "can" instead of "will" here that makes my point for me - there is no "ideal" here because it is entirely contextual and personal. The "ideal" you present is simply your own personal one. For example you say we all want to be sexually satisfied. For some this is simply not attainable until they have sexually experimented with more than one person or type of sex etc etc.
Proof? I said that the opposite was my contention, but I wouldn't present it as fact. I do think that, physically speaking, getting off is getting off. Obviously it's true that different people like to get off different ways, but that doesn't indicate that they need to...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
