Online dating: Superman?

[houstan-dan]

I used the free sites because I did awesome on them. I had tried match in the past and it sucked at the location I lived.

Money was not the issue, the site/amt of real ppl were.

[LS Jaun]

Originally Posted by mainebrokerman

upper management in a corporation and liberal??

that's like seeing a bush/cheney bumper sticker on a prius .......HIGHLY UNLIKELY!!

First thing I thought!

[NilaJones]

Originally Posted by weezerfan84

I don't doubt that Match used to be a better site, but a lot has changed since then.

Naw. I was single when match first started, and it sucked then, too.

I think he is on OKC instead of match because he does not care about the cost, and OKC has more people who are liberal like him. Or maybe he is on both .

As for fakery, that should be pretty easy to spot if you do start dating him IRL. Just drop by some of his volunteer stuff,

[Hivemind31]

Originally Posted by timberline742

I've done match, it isn't anymore exclusive than OKC nowadays. And perhaps they were, perhaps they weren't. I've known other C level execs (not from PwC) on OKC.

A couple of contributions:

1) OKC has paid features as bonuses, that some people treat as if it were a paid site (messaging priority, "invisibility", more granular search parameters, etc.)

2) For what it's worth, I'm a C-level exec on OKC. So add another to the list

Edit: 3) Also, I second the very possible option of "socially liberal and fiscally conservative". Politics, contrary to what many believe, do not have to be black and white.