Playgirl

[Erma]

Originally Posted by Ivorytickler

Simple. We're not visually stimulated like men. I'm convinced men are much more visual than women. If I'm not visual, I'm going to look at weird things hanging off of a body as weird things hanging off a body . Now if we were visually stiumlated, the sight of sexual organs might do something for us.

haha...yea, like cleaning chicken!

[pushkinswife]

I'm a more "hands on" type of lady

[butterbiscuits]

I guess I'm in the minority because I can be turned on by a tastefully done picture of a gorgeous, sexy naked male with his engorged, pulsating, and veiny member giving a six gun salute (no oxymoron intended, lol)....maybe it's just me....

I will say that Playgirl (although I've maybe seen one issue several eons ago) like most "women geared porn" leaves much to be desired.

[sierraAZ]

Originally Posted by butterbiscuits

I guess I'm in the minority because I can be turned on by a tastefully done picture of a gorgeous, sexy naked male with his engorged, pulsating, and veiny member giving a six gun salute (no oxymoron intended, lol)....maybe it's just me....

I will say that Playgirl (although I've maybe seen one issue several eons ago) like most "women geared porn" leaves much to be desired.

Wow, you must really feel strongly about Playgirl in order to register just for that!

[butterbiscuits]

Originally Posted by sierraAZ

Wow, you must really feel strongly about Playgirl in order to register just for that!

Yeah, lol, been thinking about it for days now but this subject matter put me over the fence!

[2mares]

I got a supscription once. Like butterbiscuits said, it left much to be desired. I dont however agree that men are more visual than. Looking at a naked attractive man gets me hot but not so much the

engorged, pulsating, and veiny member

as nice tight abs and arse, or strong forearms or eyes or lips.

[paramour]

I would personally rather look at Playboy than Playgirl, which lacks considerable "oomph" in my opinion.

[once-upon-chicago]

Bought a couple of issues when I was younger but I think in general, no, it didn't do anything for me. Actually, I remember it being a bit dissapointing "you mean its that small?!" It's always seemed more like a soft-core magazine for gay men.